ARIJIT PASAYAT, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, H.L.DATTU
Raju – Appellant
Versus
The State by Inspector of Police – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. —
1. Leave granted.
2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Madras High Court altering the conviction of the appellant from offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the ‘IPC’) to Section 341 Part I IPC and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years.
3. By the common judgment two Criminal Appeals were disposed of. Appeal filed by K. Periyapandian, the co-accused, was allowed and he was acquitted.
4. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:
PW-1 is the wife of Virupachi Gounder @ Palanichami Gounder (hereinafter referred to as the ‘deceased’) and PWs 3 and 4 are the sons of the deceased. PWs 3 and 4 were living in Virupachi. PW-1 and the deceased were living in Balassamudhram. The deceased was doing money lending business and accused Nos. 1 and 2 were actually working as brokers for commission under the deceased and they were aggrieved that proper commission was not paid to them. The accused complained to P.Ws.3 and 4 about the conduct of the deceased and in turn P.Ws.3 and 4 have informed P.W.1 that their father should take care since both the accused mi
State of Rajasthan v. Raja Ram
In State of U.P. v. Ashok Kumar Srivastava
C.Chenga Reddy and Ors. v. State of A.P.
State of Haryana v. Jagbir Singh and Anr.
Hanumant Govind Nargundkar and Anr. V. State of Madhya Pradesh
Eradu and Ors. v. State of Hyderabad
Hukam Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Earabhadrappa v.State of Karnataka
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
State of U.P. v. Sukhbasi and Ors.
Ashok Kumar Chatterjee v. State of M.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.