LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
Kanti Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.—
1. Both these appeals arising out of a common judgment and order dated 26.04.2001 passed by learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur in S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 125 of 1997 [Arvind Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan] and S. B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 202 of 1997 [Arvind Kumar [DW-2] Vs. State of Rajasthan], were taken up and heard together and shall stand disposed of by this common judgment.
2. By the impugned order, the High Court while dismissing the appeal of Arvind Kumar [A-1] and Kanti Lal [A-3] and confirming their conviction and sentence under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [for short the “IPC”] recorded by the learned Sessions Judge, Jalore, in Sessions Case No. 25 of 1993, has set aside the conviction of Sanwal Chand [A-2], Bhanwar Lal [A-4], Chetan Lal [A-5], Popat Lal [A-6] and Smt. Bagtu [A-7] and acquitted them of the charged offences. However, S. B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 202 of 1997 filed by Arvind Kumar Sengwa - Naib Tehsildar [DW-2] under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying for expunging adverse observations made by the learned Sessions Judge a
Pawan Kumar v. State of Haryana
Hira Lal v. State [Govt. of NCT], Delhi
Kamesh Panjiyar alias Kamlesh Panjiyar v. State of Bihar
Ram Badan Sharma v. State of Bihar with Surya Kant Sharma v. State of Bihar
Trimukh Maroti Kirkan v. State of Maharashtra
Appasaheb v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.