SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 191

A. P. MISRA, M. M. PUNCHHI
Pawan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

A.P. Misra, J.-For more than a century, inspite of tall words of respect for women, there has been an onslaught on their liberties through ‘bride burning’ and ‘dowry deaths’. This has caused anxiety to the legislators, judiciary and law enforcing agencies, who have at­tempted to resurrect them from this social choke. There have been series of legislations in this regard, without much effect. This led to the passing of Dowry Prohibition Act in 1961. Inspite of this, large number of ‘bridges burning’ and dowry deaths continued. To meet this, stringent measures were brought in the Indian Penal Code and the Evidence Act through amendments. It seems, sections of society are still boldly pursuing this chronic action to fulfil their greedy desires. Inspite of stringent legislations, such persons are still indulging in these unlawful activities, not because of any shortcom­ings in law but under the protective principle of criminal jurispru­dence of benefit of doubt. Often, innocent persons are also trapped or brought in with ulterior motives. This places are arduous duty on the Court to separate such individuals from the offenders. Hence the Courts have to deal such cases with circ

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top