D.K.JAIN, R.M.LODHA
Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
K. Mohandas – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.M. Lodha, J.—
Leave granted.
2. These sixteen appeals arise from the judgments of Punjab and Haryana High Court, Calcutta High Court and Kerala High Court and relate to different banks but since the common issues are involved, it is appropriate that these appeals are dealt with and disposed of by the common judgment.
3. In the month of May, 2000, Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Banking Division), advised the nationalized banks to carry out detailed manpower planning as these banks were found to have 25% of its manpower as surplus. A Human Resource Management Committee was constituted to examine the said issue and to suggest suitable remedial measures. The committee so constituted observed that high established cost and low productivity in public sector banks affect their profitability and it was necessary for these banks to convert their human resources into assets compatible with business strategies. Inter alia, the committee placed the draft Voluntary Retirement Scheme with the Central Government that would assist the banks in their efforts to optimize their human resources and achieve a balanced age and skills profile in keeping with their business strategie
Bank of India v. O.P. Swarnakar
HEC Voluntary Retd. Employees Welfare Society v. Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd.
Ambica Quarry Works v. State of Gujarat
Bhavnagar University v. Palitana Sugar Mill (P) Ltd.
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. N.R. Vairamani
Ottoman Bank of Nicosia v. Ohanes Chakarian
Ganga Saran v. Firm Ram Charan Ram Gopal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.