TARUN CHATTERJEE, R.M.LODHA
Ashok K. Jha – Appellant
Versus
Garden Silk Mills – Respondent
JUDGEMENT
R.M. Lodha, J.
Leave granted.
2. Two questions that arise for consideration in this appeal by special leave are:
(1) Whether transfer of the 31 employees (appellants) from Crimping Department to Twisting Department by the respondent - employer tantamounts to change in respect of matter specified in item nos. 1 and 2 of Schedule II necessitating notice under Section 42(1) of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946?
(2) Whether Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent was maintainable from the judgment and order dated October 1, 2007 passed by the learned single Judge in Special Civil Application No. 21828/2006?
3. We may briefly notice the relevant facts first Garden Silk Mills Ltd. - respondent (hereinafter referred to as, “employer”) have their mills at Vareli,Taluka Palsane, District Surat. The mills have many departments including Crimping Department and Twisting Department which are located in the same campus. The appellants (hereinafter referred to as, “employees”), prior to May 3, 1996, were working as Crimping Operators in the Crimping Department. Initially on May 3, 1996, these employees were informed that they have been transferred to Twisting
Ratnagiri District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Dinkar Kashinath Wative
Sushilabai Laxminarayan Mudliyar and others vs. Nihalchand Waghajibhai Shah and Others
Kishori Lal vs. Sales Officer, District Land Development Bank and Ors
State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. vs. Visan Kumar Shiv Charan Lal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.