SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 517

MARKANDEY KATJU, G.S.SINGHVI
V. Subramaniam – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Raghuvandra Rao – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :----- For the Respondent: ----

JUDGMENT :-

Markandey Katju, J.

1. This appeal by special leave has been filed against the impugned judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 27.9.2000 in Civil Reference No.19 of 1999.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. This appeal arises out of a suit filed before the Bombay City Civil Court instituted by the appellant praying inter alia for dissolution of an unregistered partnership firm between the appellant and the respondent. In that suit a defence taken was that the suit was not maintainable in view of sub-section (2A) of Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act). The Bombay City Civil Court was of the view that the said sub-section 2A, which was introduced by the Maharashtra Amendment to Section 69 of the Act, being the Maharashtra Act no.29 of 1984 (which received assent of the President of India) was unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 and 19 (1)(g) of the Constitution of India. Hence the Bombay City Civil Court by order dated 16.8.1999 made a reference to the High Court under Section 113 of C.P.C.

4. The High Court, however, in the impugned judgment has held that the said subsection 2A o








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top