ARIJIT PASAYAT, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
Hanumantappa Bhimappa Dalavai – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent
Judgment:
Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J.
1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court upholding the convictions of the appellants for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the ‘IPC). The appellant No.1 was additionally convicted for offence punishable under Section 326 IPC.
2. Prosecution version in a nutshell are as follows:
The accused nos.1 to 3 - the deceased and injured belonged to Salahalli Village. There is a tea shop of the accused No.1 situated outside the village, by the side of the compound of which a public road is situated, some jail hedges have grown in the said land of accused No.1 by the other side of the road, which have over grown obstructing to some extent the public path. With regard to the inconvenience caused to the passersby and the persons taking vehicles like tractor, the complainant - Irappa Aijappa Kuri (P.W.5) often complained to the accused No.1 to cut the excess hedges, to which the accused No.1 paid no heed. On 1.2.1995, while coming home, the complainant asked the accused No.1 to cut the excess growth of hedge for which the accused No.1 became angry and threatened that h
Munshi Ram and Ors. v. Delhi Administration: AIR 1968 SC 702
State of Gujarat v. Bai Fatima: AIR 1975 SC 1478:
State of U.P. v. Mohd. Musheer Khan: AIR 1977 SC 2226
Mohinder Pal Jolly v. State of Punjab: AIR 1979 SC 577
Jai Dev. v. State of Punjab AIR 1963 SC 612
Biran Singh v. State of Bihar AIR 1975 SC 87
Sekar @Raja Sekharan v. State represented by Inspector of Police
Ananta Deb Singha Mahapatra & Ors. v. State of W.B. 2007 (13) SCC 374
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.