ARIJIT PASAYAT, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
The Govt. of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
P. Chandra Mouli – Respondent
Judgment :
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
1.1. Leave granted.
2.2. Challenge in this appeal is by the State of Andhra Pradesh questioning the judgment passed a Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent No.1. The proceedings initiated by the Director General of Police (in short the `DGP)placing respondent No. 1 under suspension pending conclusion of disciplinary proceedings were quashed. Cost of Rs.10,000/-was imposed to be paid by the DGP and the Commissioner of Police.
3.3. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:
On 17.1.2005 the then Commissioner of Police, Hydrabad, respondent No.2 herein had relieved the respondent No.1 from the post of Assistant Commissioner of Police, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad and directed him to report in the office of DGP.
On 26.1.2005 Respondent No. 1 filed O.A. bearing No. 413 of 2005 before the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (in short the `Tribunal) in which the Director General of Police, Commissioner of Police and Dy. Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad were pleaded as respondents. The present respondent No.2 was not impleaded.
On 1.2.2005 the Director General Police placed the respondent No
S. Pratap Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 1964 SC 72
E. P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Another AIR 1974 SC 555
Gulam Mustafa and Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. 1976 (1) SCC 800
Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. v. Ashok Kumar Arora 1997(3) SCC 72
Lalit Popli v. Canara Bank 2003(3) SCC 583
Indian Railway Construction Co. Ltd. v. Ajay Kumar 2003 (4) SCC 579
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.