ARIJIT PASAYAT, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Y. Moideen Kunhi (dead) by Lrs. – Respondent
Understood. Please provide the legal document content (inside
Judgment :
Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J.
1. The special leave petitions are directed against the judgment and order dated 7.11.1990 in Writ Petition No.40425 of 1982 and Writ Petition No.10920 of 1983 and order dated 26.9.2007 in Review Petition No.817 of 2004 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court. It appears that there is a delay of more than nearly 6500 days against the original order and about 300 days so far as the review petition is concerned.
2. Before dealing with the question of delay it is necessary to take note of the States case before the High Court.
3. The records disclose that the agricultural lands to the extent of 50.89 acres, 30.00 acres, 462.00 acres, 3485.83 were purchased through registered partnership firm M/s Y. Moideen Kunhi & Company. All the lands are sub-divisions of Sy. No.146 of Neriya Village, Puttur Taluk.
4. The declaration under Section 66 (4) of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the `Act) was filed by the three partners of the firm i.e.. respondent Nos. 1,2 and 3 herein for determination of the excess holding. In the very declaration it is stated that the lands being the plantation lands, are exempted un
G. Ramegowda, Major etc. v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer
Nand Kishore v. State of Punjab 1995 (6) SCC 614
State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani and Ors. 1996 (3) SCC 132
Special Tehsildar, Land Acquisition
State of Nagaland v. Lipok AO and Ors. 2005 (3) SCC 752
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Ahmed Jaan 2008 (11) SCALE 455
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.