MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, ARIJIT PASAYAT
State (NCT of Delhi) – Appellant
Versus
Ahmed Jaan – Respondent
JUDGMENT (Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J)
1. Leave granted.
2. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court dismissing the Criminal Revision Petition (Crl.R.P.No.356/2004) on the ground that there was inordinate delay in filing and re-filing the revision petition.
3. Factual position as highlighted by the appellant is as follows: The respondent, who is a resident of Jammu &, Kashmir, was apprehended at Sheila Cinema in Delhi on 05.03.1997 on the basis of information that he belongs to a terrorist outfit "Tehreek-ul-Mujahideen (TUM) of J&K. From a search of his person and his hotel room, a letter containing instructions regarding activities to be carried out in Delhi for collecting money and arms for freedom of Kashmir was recovered. The letter contained coded information regarding RDX and Grenades as "ATTA and ANAR and was allegedly written by one Abu Ibrahim. A personal diary containing telephone numbers of Pakistan and a sum of Rs.30,000/- suspected to be Hawala money were also recovered from the respondent. It was found that the respondent had been frequently coming to Delhi and stayed at Welcome Guest House and used to make telephone
G.Ramegowda, Major v. Spl.Land Acquisition Officer
State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani and Ors.
Special Tehsildar, Land Acquisition, Kerala v. K.V. Ayisumma
REFERRED TO : N.Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy
New India Insurance Co.Ltd. v. Shanti Misra
Concord of India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nirmala Devi
O.P.Kathpalia v. Lakhmir Singh
Collector Land Acquisition v. Katiji
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.