S.B.SINHA, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
Uttamrao Shivdas Jankar – Appellant
Versus
Ranjitsinh Vijaysinh Mohite-Patil – Respondent
Judgment :-
S.B. Sinha, J
1. The extent of jurisdiction of a returning officer to determine a question as to whether a nomination paper filed by an applicant to enable him to contest an election in terms of the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (for short "the Act") on the premise that the names of the proposers were forged is the question involved in this appeal. It arises out of a judgment and order dated 26.08.2008 passed by the Bombay High Court in Election Petition No. 1 of 2004.
2. Indisputably, an election to the local authorities constituency Solapur for Maharashtra Legislative Council Biennial Elections, 2003 was to take place. The parties hereto contested the said election. For the said purpose, the returning officer issued a notification declaring the programme for election of the said constituency in terms whereof nomination papers were to be submitted by 14.11.2003 before 3.00 p.m. and the scrutiny thereof was to be completed in his office on 15.11.2003 at 11.00 a.m.
3. Appellant filed his nomination paper in the prescribed form in the office of the Returning Officer on 14.11.2003. As is required, his name was proposed by 10 voters. Sharif Mohamme
Rakesh Kumar v. Sunil Kumar (1999) 2 SCC 489
Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar (2003) 8 SCC 673
Cholan Roadways Ltd. v. G. Thirugnanasambandam (2005) 3 SCC 241
S.N. Chandrashekar v. State of Karnataka (2006) 3 SCC 208
Indian Airlines Ltd. v. Prabha D. Kanan (2006) 11 SCC 67
Pothula Rama Rao v. Pendyala Venkata Krishna Rao (2007) 11 SCC 1
Meerut Development Authority v. Association of Management Studies & Anr. 2009 (6) SCALE 49
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.