J.M.PANCHAL, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Kartick Chandra Mondal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J.—
1. By filing the present appeal, the appellants have challenged the legality and validity of the order dated 17.08.2005 passed by the Calcutta High Court whereby the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court upheld the direction given by the Central Administrative Tribunal [for short ‘CAT’] to absorb the respondents in any suitable post commensurate with their qualifications.
2. The issue that is, therefore, canvassed before this Court by the appellants is whether such direction to absorb the respondents could have been issued by the CAT and the Calcutta High Court, particularly, in view of the fact that the respondents were engaged as Peons on casual basis without having been recruited through the proper procedure and having not been sponsored by the Employment Exchange and having worked with the appellant no. 2 only for two years, i.e., from 1981 to 1983.
3. The respondents herein, Shri K.C. Mondal and Shri S.K. Chakraborty, were engaged to work as casual labours in the office of the Ordnance Factory Board, Kolkata without going through the regular process of recruitment of their names being sponsored by the Employment Exchange, which was the
Ansal Properties and Industries Limited v. State of Haryana [(2009) 3 SCC 553]
State of Bihar and Others v. Kripalu Shankar and Others [(1987) 3 SCC 34
Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others v. Umadevi (3) and Others reported in (2006) 4 SCC 1
Official Liquidator v. Dayanand and Others reported in (2008) 10 SCC 1
South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. v. State of M.P. and Others [(2003) 8 SCC 648]
Maharaj Krishan Bhatt and Another v. State of J&K and Others [(2008) 9 SCC 24]].
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.