R.V.RAVEENDRAN, K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
R. K. Chopra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.
Leave granted.
2. We are, in this case, concerned with a claim of a Government servant for revision of subsistence allowance based on the pay revision effected by the Central Civil Services (Revision Pay ) Rules, 1997, which came into force on the 1st day of January, 1996, while he was under suspension from service.
3. The Respondent herein was working as a Desk Officer in the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion under the Ministry of Commerce and Industries. While so, a case was registered against him by Central Bureau of Investigation under the Prevention of Corruption Act and he was placed under suspension by the Department w.e.f. 06.06.1989 under rule 10 (2) of the CCS (CCA) Rules 1965. Subsistence allowance due to him under Fundamental Rules 53 (1) (ii) (a) was paid to him which was later enhanced to 50% vide order No. 5/7/99, dated 30.05.1991. At the time of suspension he was in the scale of pay of Rs. 2000-3500 and was drawing a basic pay of Rs. 2,825/-. While undergoing suspension he made a representation on 22.7.2002 for revision of subsistence allowance based on the 5th Pay Commission Report. Request was rejected by the Government
State of Maharashtra vs. Chandrabhan Tale [(1983) 3 SCC 387]; distinguished (Para 7)
Khem Chand vs. Union of India [ 1963 Supp. 1 SCR 229]; distinguished (Para 7)
P.L.Shah vs. Union of India and Anr. [(1989) 1 SCC 546]; distinguished (Para 7)
R.P. Kapur Vs.Union of India & Ors. [(1999) 8 SCC 110]; distinguished (Para 7)
Umesh Chandra Misra vs. Union of India [1993 Supp. (2) SCC 210] distinguished (Para 7)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.