D.K.JAIN, H.L.DATTU
Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-II Commissionerate – Appellant
Versus
Tarpaulin International – Respondent
JUDGMENT
H.L. Dattu, J. —
ISSUE:
These appeals, which are at the instance of the Commissioner of Central Excise, raise a common issue, viz., whether the tarpaulin made-ups which are prepared after cutting and stitching the tarpaulin fabric and fixing the eye-lets would involve the process of manufacture and, hence, would fall within the definition of ‘manufacture’ ?
FACTS:
2) The issue above mentioned has come up in the light of the following facts which can be briefly stated as follows: we take M/s Tarpaulin International Civil Appeal No. 5341 of 2005 as the lead case. The noticee is carrying on the business of producing and selling ‘tarpaulin made-ups’. The ‘tarpaulin made-ups’ are nothing but the tarpaulin cloth which is prepared by making solution of wax, aluminum stearate and pigments which are mixed and the solution is heated in a vessel and transferred to a tank. Grey cotton canvas fabric is then dipped into this solution and passed through two rollers, where after the canvas is dried by exposure to atmosphere. Thereafter, the tarpaulin made-ups are prepared by cutting the cloth into various sizes and stitched and eye- lets are fitted. The noticee states that the process of mer
Kores India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai
South Bihar Sugar Mills v. Union of India
Bhor Industries Ltd., Bombay v. Collector of Central Excise, Bombay
B.P.L. India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Cochin
Moti Laminates Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.