SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 782

Supreme Court of India
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM & THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN
Babubhai & Others
Versus
State of Gujarat & Others
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1599 of 2010 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.2077 of 2010) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1600-1605 of 2010 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos. 3235-3240 of 2010)
Decided on : 26-08-2010

Advocates appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:U.U. Lalit, P.S. Narsimha, R.K. Abichandani, C.A. Sundaram, Senior Advocates, Tushar Mehta, AAG, Ankur Chawla, Rahul Pratap, Jayant Mohan (for M/s. COAC), Vimal Chandra S. Dave, Mrs. Laxmi Abichandani, Sunil Patel, Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Ms. Meensha Lovkumar, Ms. Nupur, Sushil Kumar Jain, Puneet Jain, Ms. Rohini Musa, Abhishek Gupta, Zafar I., Anandh Kannan, P.K. Dey, Anirudh Sharma, A.K. Sharma, V.K. Biju, D.R. Bhatt, D.K. Garg, Keshav C. Thakur, Advocates.

Headnote:Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Sections 154 and 173 - Two FIRs in respect of same offence - It must be found out whether both FIRs relate to same incident in respect of same occurrence or are in regard to incidents which are two or more parts of same transaction - If answer is affirmative, second FIR is liable to be quashed - However, where version in second FIR is different and they are in respect of two different incidents/crimes, second FIR is permissible and investigation on both FIRs has to be conducted. (Paras 17 to 20)

       (2004) 13 SCC 292; (2006) 1 SCC 732; (2009) 1 SCC 441-Relied upon.

       Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 173 - Investigating agency cannot be permitted to conduct investigation in tainted and biased manner - Section 173 provides for further investigation and not re-investigation - However, Court in order to prevent miscarriage of criminal justice, may direct for investigation de novo - Investigation must be fair, transparent and judicious. (Paras 25 to 34)

       AIR 2000 SC 3275; (1998) 5 SCC 223; (2008) 5 SCC 413; (2009) 6 SCC 332; (2009) 7 SCC 685; AIR 1961 SC 1346; AIR 2001 SC 196; AIR 2007 SC 137-Relied upon.

Judgement Key Points

Certainly! Please provide the legal document content so I can analyze it and generate the key points with the appropriate references.


Judgment :

Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. These appeals and other connected appeals have been preferred against the judgment and order dated 22.12.2009 of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, passed in Special Criminal Application Nos. 1675/2008, 1679/2008 with Crl. Misc. Application Nos. 8249/2009, 8361/2009, 8363/2009 and 7687/2009.

3. Facts and circumstances giving rise to the present cases are that on 7.7.2008, some altercation took place between members of the Bharwad and the Koli Patel communities over the plying of rickshaws in the area surrounding Dhedhal village of Distt. Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The Bharwad community had been preventing the Koli Patels from running their rickshaws in the said area.

On the next day, i.e. on 8.7.2008, case No. C.R.No.I-154/2008, was registered at 17:30 hours in the Bavla Police Station under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 332, 333, 436 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter called as "IPC") read with Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 (for short "BP Act") and Sections 3, 7 of Prevention of Damages of Public Property Act, 1984 (for short "1984 Act") for an incident which occurred at Village Dhedhal, wherein Mr. M.N. Pandya, Sub-Inspector of Police, Bavla Police Station has stated that while he was patrolling in Bavla Town, he received a message from H.C. Kanaiyalal, Police Station Officer, at 10.00 a.m. that some altercation/incident had taken place between the two communities at Dhedhal Cross Roads. On receiving the said information, he along with other police personnel, rushed to the place of incident, however, by that time the crowd had already dispersed. Thereafter, he received information that a clash was going on between the said two communities in Dhedhal village. Immediately, he contacted the Control Room, as well as the Deputy Superintendent of Police of Dholka, for further police support and rushed to the spot where he found about 2000-3000 persons from both the communities, all with sticks, dhariyas, swords etc., attacking each other. The police resorted to teargas shells as well as to lathi charges to disperse the crowd. Several rounds of firing were resorted to in order to disperse the mob. In the incident, more than 20 persons were injured and three houses of members of the Bharwad community were set on fire. One person, namely Ajitbhai Prahladbhai, also died. Several police personnel were also injured. No person was named in the said FIR.

4. Another FIR, being Case No. C.R.No. I-155 of 2008, was registered at Bavla Police Station on the same date i.e. 8.7.2008 at 22:35 hrs by Babubhai Popatbhai Koli Patel (appellant in SLP (Crl.) No.2077/2010 and respondent in SLP (Crl.) Nos. 3235-3240/2010) (hereinafter called as complainant), resident of village Vasna, Taluka Bavla, wherein he alleged that an incident took place on the same day at 9:15 hours near Dhedhal village in which he named 18 persons as accused. As per this FIR, an incident occurred on 7.7.2008 in the evening at about 6.30 p.m. His cousin Jayantibhai Gordhanbhai told him that when Budhabhai of their village and two rickshaw-walas were taking passengers at Dhedhal Chokdi, the Bharwads of Dhedhal village who were also plying rickshaws, chhakdas etc. told the Koli Patels not to take passengers from there and they took away the keys of the jeep, beat up the Koli Patel boys, abused and threatened them and told them not to bring jeeps and rickshaws to Dhedhal Chokdi. Babubhai Popatbhai Koli Patel, complainant reached Dhedhal Chokdi and met Budhabhai Laljibhai Koli Patel of his village and his brother Jayantibhai Laljibhai and enquired about the incident. They complained about browbeating and threatening by the Bharwads as the Bharwads wanted that no one else should bring jeeps and chhakdas to Dhedhal Chokdi. The informant/complainant stated that Kantibhai Ratanbhai Bharwad and other persons standing nearby told them to stop and threats were made by the Bharwads. On the date of the incide































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top