SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1919

S.B.SINHA, CYRIAC JOSEPH
SHARON MICHAEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) APPELLANTS are before us being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 2. 3. 2006 passed by a learned Single of the High court of Judicature at Madras in Criminal Appeal No. 26498 of 2005 dismissing their applications for quashing the summons issued to them in crime No. 32 of 2005 on a complaint filed by one of the partners of M/s. Aarbee Apparels Impex, Tiruppur under Sections 120-B, 409 and 420 of the indian Penal Code (for short, "ipc" ).

( 3 ) M/s. T. M. S. Fashion Private Limited, Chennai (for short, "the company") is a certifying agent. Appellant No. 1 is the Assistant General manager of the company engaged in export of garments. Appellant No. 2 is the Accounts Manager, Appellant No. 3 is the Shipping Manager, Appellant no. 4 is one of its Directors and Appellant No. 5 is a Consultant for the company. Appellant No. 6 is an employee of Bax Global Private Ltd. who has nothing to do with the appellant company.

( 4 ) IN the complaint petition, the complainant alleged that the appellant nos. 1 to 4 had approached the Aarbee Apparels Impex which is engaged in the manufacture of Hosiery Garments in the month of Decem









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top