AFTAB ALAM, S.B.SINHA
R. Kalyani – Appellant
Versus
Janak C. Mehta – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J. —
1. Leave granted.
2. Appellant lodged a First Information Report (FIR) against the respondents on or about 4.1.2003 under Sections 409, 420 and 468 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. First and second respondent approached the High Court for an order for quashing of the said FIR as also the investigation initiated pursuant thereto or in furtherance thereof. The High Court allowed the said proceedings by reason of the impugned order dated 29.4.2004.
Mr. K.K. Mani, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, would, in support of the appeal, contend :
(1) The High Court exercised its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure wholly illegally and without jurisdiction insofar as it entered into the disputed questions of fact in regard to the involvement of the respondents as the contents of the first information report disclose an offence of cheating, criminal breech of trust and forgery.
(2) While admittedly the investigation was not even complete, the High Court could not have relied upon the documents furnished by the defendants either for the purpose of finding out absence of mens rea on the part of the appli
Radhey Shyam Khemka v. State of Bihar
Hira Lal Hari Lal Bhagwati v. CBI, New Delhi
Sham Sunder v. State of Haryana
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal
Kailsah Verma v. Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation
State of Orissa v. Saroj Kumar Sahoo
Rajesh Bajaj v. State of NCT of Delhi
Vir Prakash Sharma v. Anil Kumar Agarwal
Sunita Jain v. Pawan Kumar Jain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.