SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1771

CYRIAC JOSEPH, S.B.SINHA
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, U. P. – Appellant
Versus
S. S. AYODHYA DISTILLERY – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) LEAVE granted. Question

( 2 ) WHETHER Paddy Husk and Rice Husk connote the same commodity or not is the question involved herein. An overview

( 3 ) RESPONDENTS, who own and operate their manufacturing units, use paddy Husk as fuel in their respective factories. They were assessed for payment of sales tax in terms of various notifications issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh (for short, `the State')from time to time under Section 3d of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act (for short, `the Act' ).

( 4 ) BEFORE we advert to the rival contentions of the parties, we may notice certain statutory provisions. Section 3 of the Act is the charging provision. The rate of tax is determined by the State in exercise of its power conferred on it under section 3a of the Act. Section 3d of the Act which is material for our purpose, reads as under :

"section 3-D - Levy of trade tax on purchase of sales of certain goods-- (1) Except as provided in sub-section (2), there shall be levied and paid, for each assessment year or part thereof, a tax on the turnover, to be determined in the prescribed manner-- (a) of first purchases of opium, at such rate not exceeding 'thirty-five percent ; (b

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top