SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(MP) 348

N.D.OJHA, K.K.ADHIKARI
Chordia Kavelu Udyog – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.L.SAXENA, V.S.Dabir,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THE petitioner is a registered dealer under the M. P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") as also under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. For the period between 1982-84, a question arose as to whether rice bran is exempt from sales tax under notification dated 1st April, 1982 a copy whereof has been attached as annexure G-1 to the writ petition. This notification was in force between 1st April, 1982 and 31st March, 1985 and thus it would be relevant for considering the aforesaid question. The class of goods shown in column 2 of the Schedule to the said notification which were exempted from sales tax under this notification is shown as "husk of all grains, cereals, pulses and rice".

( 2. ) THE case of the petitioner was that rice bran was also included within the term "husk". This contention did not find favour with the Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax. Aggrieved, the petitioner has filed this writ petition with a prayer to quash the impugned order holding that rice bran was not exempt from sales tax.

( 3. ) IN support of the contention that rice bran was also husk within the meaning of the notification aforesaid, reliance was










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top