SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1094

Supreme Court Of India
ARIJIT PASAYAT, P. SATHASIVAM, AFTAB ALAM
STATE OF KARNATAKA
Versus
BANTARA SUDHAKARA ALIAS SUDHA
Decided On : 07/18/2008

Headnote:

Code of criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 313 - Indian Penal Code - Section 376 - Criminal Appeal - Purpose of measurement along with new clothes - Appeal against the judgment of the learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court directing acquittal of the respondents who were charged for commission of offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code - Held, Factually also the conclusion is erroneous right from the beginning that is from the stage when the FIR was lodged and in her evidence there was a categorical statement that the rape was forcibly done notwithstanding protest by the victim - High Court was therefore wrong in putting burden on the victim to show that there was no consent - Question of consent is really a matter of defence by the accused and it was for him to place materials to show that there was consent - Ordered accordingly.

ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.

( 1 ) STATE of Karnataka is in appeal against the judgment of the learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court directing acquittal of the respondents who were charged for commission of offence punishable under Section 376 of the indian Penal Code (in short the 'ipc' ).

( 2 ) BACKGROUND facts as projected by prosecution in a nutshell are as follows: p. W. 1 and PW2 were residing alongwith their respective parents at Madenadu and they were working as coolies in the coffee estate of Pudiyenda Palangappa, Appellant No. 2 (accused no. 2) is a tailor by profession having his tailoring shop at Aatekere, On 16-9-1989 at about 9. 00 a. m. , PWs, 1 and 2 went to the tailoring shop of A-2 and requested him to stitch their blouses. At that time they gave two blouses of theirs for the purpose of measurement along with new clothes. It is alleged that A-2 asked them to come on the following day to take delivery of the blouses if they were stitched. Accordingly, on 17. 9. 1989 they both went to the tailoring shop to take delivery of the clothes when A-2 informed them that the stitching was not over, upon which both of them asked him to return the blouses given for measurement. In response to that, A-2 asked them to go to his house as the blouses were left in his house. Accordingly, both of them accompanied by A-1 and A-2 went to the house which was nearby. A-1 and A-2 went inside the house and as they did not come out of the house for about 15 minutes, both PWs. 1 and 2 who were waiting outside entered the house. As soon as they entered the house, A-2 bolted the door and held P. W. 2 and A-1 also held PW-l. They were taken to separate rooms and A-1 committed rape on p. W. 1 and A-2 committed rape on PW2, Thereafter, they threatened both of them that they would be murdered if the incident was revealed to anyone, Therefore, they kept quiet, on18-9-1989 they went to Madikeri to the house of chandrakala (P. W. 14 ). Having stayed in the house of chandrakala on that night, they went to Sulia to the house of the uncle of P. W. 2. As the PWs 1 and 2 were not found in their houses, parents of PWs. 1 and 2 sent Seshappa (PW17) who is the elder brother of PW 2 to his maternal uncle's house at sulia. Accordingly, he went to the house at Sulia and found both of them and brought them back to Madenadu, thereafter, they went to Madikeri Rural Police Station on 21-9-1989 and presented a written complaint Ex-P-l signed by p. W. 1 which was received by P. W. 26 at 6. 45 p. m. On that day, pw 26 registered a case in Madikeri Rural Police Station in Cr, no. 233/89 and submitted FIR as per Ex-P. 33. On the next day he sent them for medical examination to the District hospital, Madikeri. PWs. 1 and 2 also produced clothes which they were wearing at the time of incident which were seized. P. W. 26 went to the scene of occurrence which is the house of a-2 where the alleged rape was committed on PWs. 1 and 2, He drew up mahazar Ex-P4 in the house of PW2 in the presence of panchas and seized broken bangles MOs. 8 and 9, He also drew mahazar in the shop of A-2 as per Ex-P3 and seized the clothes given for stitching by PWs. 1 and 2. On 23-9-1989 A-1 was arrested. PW-26 recorded the statement of A-1 who led them to his house where he drew a mahazar as per Ex-P. 33. Thereafter, further investigation was taken up by P. W. 24, the circle Inspector of Police. On 13-11-1989 A-2 appeared before him with order of anticipatory bail. His statement was recorded after arresting him. He also produced clothes that he was wearing at the time of incident from his house which were seized as per Ex-P. 29. Both A-1 and A-2 were subjected to medical examination, Dr. G. Marulasiddappa (P. W 25) issued certificate of A-1 as per Ex-P. 27 and Dr. Suryakumar (PW-3)issued certificate of A-2 as per Ex P. 6. After receipt of the FSL report, he filed a charge sheet. Thereafter, the case was committed to the Court of Sessions, as the offence alleged against these accused person









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top