H.L.DATTU, D.K.JAIN
Pebam Ningol Mikoi Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Manipur – Respondent
JUDGMENT
H.L. Dattu, J. —
1) Leave granted.
2) By our order dated 14.09.2010, after hearing the learned counsel for the parties to the lis, we had directed the release of the detenu, since we were satisfied that the appellant prima- facie had made out a case for release of the detenu. Now we give our reasons for allowing this appeal in support of our pre-emptory order.
3) Here is an unfortunate case involving a person who ought not to have been detained under preventive detention and have his liberty curtailed by virtue of his incarceration under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 (hereinafter “NS Act”).
4) Individual liberty is a cherished right, one of the most valuable Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Constitution to the citizens of this Country. On “liberty”, William Shakespeare, the great play writer, has observed that “a man is master of his liberty”. Benjamin Franklin goes even further and says that “any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both”. The importance of protecting liberty and freedom is explained by the famous lawyer Clarence Darrow as “you can protect your liberties in this world onl
Mohd. Yousuf Rather Vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir and Ors. (AIR 1979 SC 1925)
State of Rajasthan v. Talib Khan, (1996) 11 SCC 393
Shafiq Ahmed v. District Magistrate, Meerut, (1989) 4 SCC 556
State of Punjab v. Sukhpal Singh, (1990) 1 SCC 35
Fazal Ghosi v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1987) 3 SCC 502
Haji Mohd. Akhlaq v. District Magistrate, 1988 Supp (1) SCC 538
Union of India v. Laishram Lincola Singh @ Nicolai, (2008) 5 SCC 490
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.