SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 1195

R.M.LODHA, AFTAB ALAM
Man Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ram Kala – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.M. LODHA, J. —

This appeal, by special leave, is directed against the judgment dated January 7, 2004 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana whereby the second appeal preferred by present respondents 1(i) to (vi) was allowed and the judgment and decree dated December 21, 1981 passed by the Additional District Judge (III), Kurukshetra was set aside and the judgment and decree dated August 31, 1981 passed by Sub-Judge, Ist Class, Kaithal was restored.

2. Soran, resident of Village Bandrana, Tehsil Kaithal, District Kurushetra, Haryana died intestate leaving two wives – Nanhi and Shingari, one son Ram Kala and three daughters Chameli, Panmehswari and Boghri him surviving. Soran’s first wife was Pratapi who pre-deceased him. Ram Kala was born out of that wedlock. Chameli, Panmeshwari and Boghri are daughters of Shingari from the loins of Soran. Prior to her marriage with Soran, Shingari was married to Lachhman and a son Man Singh was born from her first marriage.

3. Man Singh (since deceased - now represented by his wife - hereinafter referred to as ‘the appellant’) filed a suit against his mother Shingari on March 6, 1979 in the Court of Sub-Judge, IInd Class, Kaitha





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top