2011 (1) Supreme 673
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly, JJ.
National Council for Teacher Education and others — Appellants
versus
Shri Shyam Shiksha Prashikshan Sansthan and others etc. etc. — Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 1125-1128 of 2011
(Arising out of Special Leave Petition Nos.17165-17168 of 2009)
Decided on : 31-1-2011
(1979) 1 SCC 380; (1975) 1 SCC 305; (1980) 2 SCC 410 – Relied upon
(1927) 240 US 30 – Referred
(b) National Council for Teacher Education (Recognition, Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2007 – Regulation 5(4) and (5) – Entire exercise of granting recognition being time consuming, some date had to be fixed for submission of application and some time schedule had to be prescribed for taking final decision – Specified cut off dates are neither arbitrary nor irrational. (Paras 22 and 23)
(1990) 3 SCC 368; (1987) 2 SCC 453; (1985) Supp. SCC 45; (1996) 10 SCC 536; (2004) 2 SCC 76; (2005) 6 SCC 754 – Relied upon
(c) National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 – Section 14(3) r/w Regulations 5(4) and (5) – Various factors to be considered for granting recognition cannot be ascertained by Regional Committees on their own – Further, the seats allowed should be commensurate with the requirement of teachers by the State – NOC from State Government is therefore necessary. (Para 26)
(d) National Council for Teacher Education (Recognition, Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2007 – Regulation 5(4) and (5) – Cut off dates as specified in these clauses are not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. (Para 29)
(2003) 3 SCC 321; (2004) 4 SCC 513; AIR 1999 SC 2894; (2005) 3 SCC 212; (2006) 9 SCC 1 – Relied upon
Facts of the case:
Whether the cut off dates specified in clauses (4) and (5) of Regulation 5 of the National Council for Teacher Education (Recognition, Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2007 as amended by Notification F. No.48-3/(1)/2008/NCTE/N&S. dated 1.7.2008 for submission of application for recognition and disposal thereof are mandatory is the question raised in this appeal.
Finding of the Court:
It is not possible to find any fault with the decision of the Council to prescribe 31st October of the year preceding the academic session for which recognition is sought as the last date for submission of application to the Regional Committee and 15th May of the succeeding year as the date for communication of the decision about grant of recognition or refusal thereof.
JUDGMENT
G.S. Singhvi, J. —
1. Leave granted.
2. Whether the cut off dates specified in clauses (4) and (5) of Regulation 5 of the National Council for Teacher Education (Recognition, Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2007 (for short, “the 2007 Regulations”) as amended by Notification F. No.48-3/(1)/2008/NCTE/N&S. dated 1.7.2008 for submission of application for recognition and disposal thereof are mandatory and whether the learned Single Judge of the Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench was justified in issuing directions, which have the effect of obliterating the cut off dates are the questions which arise for consideration in these appeals filed by the National Council for Teacher Education and its functionaries (hereinafter described as “the appellants”) against judgment dated 13.5.2009 of the Division Bench of the High Court affirming the order of the learned Single Judge.
Scheme of the Act and the Regulations:
3. With a view to achieve the object of planned and coordinated development for the teacher education system throughout the country and for regulation and proper maintenance of norms and standards in the teacher education system and for matters connected therewith, Parliament enacted the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 (for short, “the Act”), which provides for the establishment of a Council to be called the National Council for Teacher Education (for short, “the NCTE”) with multifarious functions, powers and duties. Section 2(c) of the Act defines the term “Council” to mean a Council established under sub-section (1) of Section 3. Section 2(i) defines the term “recognised institution” to mean an institution recognised under Section 14. Section 2(j) defines the term “Regional Committee” to mean a Committee established under Section 20. Section 3 provides for establishment of the Council which comprises of a Chairperson, a Vice-Chairperson, a Member-Secretary, various functionaries of the Government, thirteen persons possessing experience and knowledge in the field of education or teaching, nine members representing the States and Union Territories Administration, three members of Parliament, three members to be appointed from amongst teachers of primary and secondary education and teachers of recognised institutions. Section 12 of the Act enumerates functions of the Council. Section 14 provides for recognition of institutions offering course or training in teacher education. Section 15 lays down the procedure for obtaining permission by an existing institution for starting a new course or training. Section 16 contains a non obstante clause and lays down that an examining body shall not grant affiliation to any institution or hold examination for a course or training conducted by a recognised institution unless it has obtained recognition from the concerned Regional Committee under Section 14 or permission for starting a new course or training under Section 15. The mechanism for dealing with the cases involving violation of the provisions of the Act or the rules, regulations orders made or issued thereunder or the conditions of recognition by a recognised institution finds place in Section 17. By an amendment made in July, 2006, Section 17-A was added to the Act. It lays down that no institution shall admit any student to a course or training in teacher education unless it has obtained recognition under Section 14 or permission under Section 15. Section 31(1) empowers the Central Government to make rules for carrying out the provisions of the Act. Section 31(2) specifies the matters in respect of which the Central Government can make rules. Under Section 32(1) the Council can make regulations for implementation of the provisions of the Act subject to the rider that the regulations shall not be inconsistent with the provisions of the Act and the rules made thereunder. Section 32(2) specifies the matters on which the Council can frame regulations. In terms of Section 33, the rules framed under Section 31
In re the Special Courts Bill, 1978
University Grants Commission v. Sadhana Chaudhary
Preeti Srivastava, Dr. v. State of M.P.
St. Johns Teachers Training Institute v. Regional Director, National Council For Teacher Education
State of Tamil Nadu v. S.V. Bratheep
Union of India v. Parameswaran Match Works
D.G. Gose and Co. (Agents) (P) Ltd. v. State of Kerala
State of Bihar v. Ramjee Prasad
Govt. of A.P. v. J.B. Educational Society
State of Punjab v. Amar Nath Goyal
Uttar Pradesh Mahavidyalaya Tadarth Shikshak Niyamitikaran Abhiyan Samiti, Varanasi v. State of U.P.
State of Maharashtra v. Sant Dnyaneshwar Shikshan Shastra Mahavidyalaya
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.