SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(SC) 351

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Union of India and another etc, Appellants
Versus
M/s. Parameswarn Match Works etc., Respondents.
Superintendent of Central Excise and others, Appellants
Versus
M/s. Gandhiji Cottage Match Works etc., Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 262-273, 587-591 and 1351-1402 of 1971 and 1883-1921 of 1972. D/- 4-11-1974.
Civil Appeals Nos. 262-273, 581-591 and 1351-1402 of 1971:
Civil Appeals Nos. 1883-1921 of 1972:

Headnote:

Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 - Section 3 - Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8Constitution of India,1950 - Article 14 - Special leave - Violative of fundamental right - Imposes excise duty on manufacture in respect of items mentioned in Schedule I of Act- Match boxes are mentioned in Item of said schedule and duty is livable on manufacture of match boxes at rates specified therein- For purpose of levy of excise duty match factories were classified on basis of their production during a financial year and matches produced in different factories were subject to varying rates of duty - A higher rate being levied on matches produced in factories having a higher output - In classification of match factories on basis of production was abandoned and they were classified as mechanized units and non mechanized units and by Notification two rates of levy were prescribed per gross boxes of matches each cleared in mechanized units amount per gross boxes of matches each cleared in non-mechanized units – Held, Concessional rate of duty can be availed of only by those who satisfy conditions which have been laid down under notification - Respondent was not a manufacturer before as it had applied for license only on and it could not have made a declaration before that its total clearance for financial year is not estimated to exceed million matches - In matter of granting concession or exemption from tax Government has a wide latitude of discretion- It need not give exemption or concession to everyone in order that it may grant same to some – As Court said object of granting concessional rate of duty was to protect smaller units in industry from competition by larger ones and that object would have been frustrated if by adopting device of fragmentation larger units could become ultimate beneficiaries of bounty - Appeals Allowed

Judgement

MATHEW, J.:- In these appeals, the facts are similar and the question for consideration is same. We will take up for consideration the appeal filed by the writ petitioner in Writ Petition No. 3838 of 1968 (hereinafter called the respondent ) against the common order in all the writ petitions.

2. The respondent filed the writ petition before the High Court of Madras questioning the validity of clause (b) of notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance (No. 205/67-CE dated September 4, 1967) on the ground that clause (b) is violative of the fundamental right of the respondent under Article 14. The High Court allowed the petition and this appeal, by special leave, is filed against the order.

3. Section 3 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (for short, the Act ) imposes excise duty on manufacture in respect of items mentioned in Schedule I of the Act. Match boxes are mentioned in Item 38 of the said schedule and duty is leviable on the manufacture of match boxes at the rates specified therein. For the purpose of levy of excise duty match factories were classified on the basis of their production during a financial year and matches produced in different factories were subject to varying rates of duty - a higher rate being levied on matches produced in factories having a higher output. In 1967, the classification of match factories on the basis of production was abandoned and they were classified as mechanised units and nonmechanised units and by Notification No. 115 of 1967 dated June 8, 1967, two rates of levy were prescribed i.e. Rs. 4.60 per gross boxes of 50 matches each cleared in mechanised units and Rs. 4.15 per gross boxes of 50 matches each cleared in non-mechanised units. A concessional rate of duty of Rs. 3.75 per gross upto 75 million matches was allowed in respect of units certified as such by the Khadi and Village Industries Commission or units set up in the co-operative sector. Notification No. 162 of 1967 dated July 21, 1967, superseded the earlier notification and the rate of duty in respect of nomechanised units was raised from Rupees 4.15 to Rs. 4.30 per gross boxes. This notification contained a proviso to the effect that if a manufacturer were to give a declaration that the total clearance from the factory will not exceed 75 million matches during a financial year, the manufacturer would be entitled to the concessional rate of duty of Rs. 3.75 per gross boxes of 50 matches each up to 75 million matches, and the quantity of matches, if any, cleared in excess up to 100 million matches will be charged at Rs. 4.30 per gross, and, if the clearance exceeds 100 million matches, the entire quantity cleared during the financial year will be charged to duty at Rs. 4.30 per gross. This notification, however, enabled the manufacturers with a capacity to produce more than 100 million matches and who were clearing more than 100 million matches during the previous years to avail of the concessional rate of duty at Rs. 3.75 per gross by filing a declaration as visulized in the proviso to the notification by restricting their clearance to 75 million matches. This would have defeated the very purpose of the notification, namely, the grant of concessional rate of duty only to small manufacturers. In order to avert this tendency on the part of the larger units, the notification dated July 21, 1967 was amended by Notification No. 205 of 1967 dated September 4, 1967. The notification reads :

"In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the Central Government hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue and Insurance) No. 162/67-Central Excises dated the 21st July, 1967, namely:-

In the proviso to the said notification after clause (i) the following shall be inserted, namely :-

(ia) nothing contained in the foregoing clause shall apply to any factory other than the f
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top