SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 61

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, S.S.NIJJAR
Lakhan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment :

B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

1. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition in Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 4724 of 2004 has been taken up and allowed. The Special Leave Petition shall stand restored to the file. Leave granted.

2. These appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 27th April, 2004 of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Appeal Nos. 649 of 1987 and 14 of 1988 whereby the High Court dismissed the Criminal Appeals filed by the appellants, confirmed their conviction for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. for committing murder of one Surender Choudhary and accordingly sentenced them to undergo life imprisonment.

3. When the matter came up for hearing, Shri K.V. Vishwanathan, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant Lakhan Lal, submitted that since at the time of commission of the said offence, the appellant had not completed 18 years of age, he was a `juvenile' within the meaning of Section 2(k) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as "the 2000 Act") and therefore, the order of sentence passed against the appellant for the offence commit





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top