G.S.SINGHVI, R.V.RAVEENDRAN
Videocon Industries Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
G.S. Singhvi, J. —
1. Leave granted.
2. Whether the Delhi High Court could entertain the petition filed by the respondents under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, “the Act”) for grant of a declaration that Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) is contractual and juridical seat of arbitration and for issue of a direction to the arbitral tribunal to continue the hearing at Kuala Lumpur in terms of clause 34 of Production Sharing Contract (PSC) is the question which arises for consideration in this appeal.
3. Respondent No.1 - Government of India owns petroleum resources within the area of India’s territorial waters and exclusive economic zones. Respondent No.2 is an arm of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. On 28.10.1994, a PSC was executed between respondent No.1 on the one hand and a consortium of four companies consisting of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited, Videocon Petroleum Limited, Command Petroleum (India) Private Limited and Ravva Oil (Singapore) Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as “the Contractor”) in terms of which the latter was granted an exploration licence and mining lease to explore and produce the hydro carbon resou
Mulamchand v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Dozco India P. Ltd. v. Doosan Infracore Co. Ltd.
Hardy Oil and Gas Limited v. Hindustan Oil Exploration Company Limited
Bhatia International v. Bulk Trading S.A.
National Thermal Power Corporation v. Singer Company
Shreejee Traco (I) Pvt. Ltd. v. Paperline International Inc.
Venture Global Engineering v. Satyam Computer Services Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.