SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 600

2011 (4) Supreme 713
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dr. Mukundakam Sharma and Anil R. Dave, JJ.
Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverage Pvt. Ltd. — Appellant
versus
Sangli Miraj & Kupwad Municipal Corporation & Ors. — Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 4917 of 2011
[Arising out of S.L.P (C) No. 16769 of 2011]
CC No. 1039 of 2011
with
Civil Appeal No. 4918 of 2011
[Arising out of S.L.P (C) No. 16771 of 2011]
CC No. 2284 of 2011
Decided on : 4-7-2011

IMPORTANT POINT
Minor factual differences do not affect applicability of otherwise binding precedent.

Headnote:(a) Bombay Provisional Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 – Section 2(42) – Octroi – To attract the levy of octroi on the goods brought within the Municipal limits, it must be proved that the goods got consumed completely within the Municipal limits or were used for an indefinite period in such a way that they come to rest finally and permanently within the Municipal limits or sold within the said limits. (Para 15)

        (1998) 5 SCC 474; AIR 1963 SC 906; 1969 UJ 373 (SC) – Relied upon

        (b) Administration of Justice – Binding precedent – Computation in Acqueous Victuals case based on weight of the bottles and craters – In the instant case it is based on value of the bottles and crates – Held, difference in mode of computation of octroi will not affect applicability of the ratio of Acqueous Victuals. (Para 18)

        (c) Bombay Provisional Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 – Section 2(42) – Octroi – If the bottles and crates have not finally rested in the Municipal limits of the Corporation, the company can always make an application for refund supported by evidence. (Para 24)

        (d) Bombay Provisional Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 – Section 2(42) – Octroi – Mechanism for computation of octroi being cumbersome and unworkable, appellant submitting proposals to the Corporation to make it workable – Corporation directed to consider the same and even otherwise devise a convenient and workable mechanism for levy and collection of octroi. (Para 25)

       Facts of the case:

        In this case levying and demanding octroi on glass bottles and crates has been challenged.

       Finding of the Court:

        There is no infirmity in the impugned judgment.

       Result : Appeals dismissed.

       

JUDGMENT

Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. —

1. Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. As both the appeals involve identical question of law the same were heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment. Both the present Civil Appeals are filed against the judgment dated 08.10.2010 in the Writ Petition No. 5510 of 2010 and against the judgment dated 08.10.2010 in the Writ Petition No. 5867 of 2010, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay whereby the Division Bench has dismissed the writ petitions filed by the appellants herein challenging the validity of the bill issued by the Respondent Corporation, levying and demanding octroi from the appellants on glass bottles and crates.

4. In the Civil Appeal filed against the judgment dated 08.10.2010 in the Writ Petition No. 5510 of 2010 the appellant company is, inter alia, engaged in the manufacture of aerated beverages marketed under different brands. The products of the company are distributed from its plant located at Pirangut Taluka, Mulshi, District Pune to amongst other places like Sangli Miraj and Kupwad.

5. According to the appellant, their products are distributed and sold in returnable and reusable glass bottles. Glass bottles are stored in plastic crates. Glass bottles and crates are owned by the appellant. They are never sold to any distributor or retailer. Once the product in the glass bottles kept in crates is consumed, glass bottles along with crates are returned to the appellant for filling after cleaning and washing them. The appellant pays octroi levied on the aerated beverages when they enter octroi limits of Municipal Corporations. The impugned bill has the effect of levying octroi separately on the glass bottles and plastic crates utilized by the appellant to pack and transport the aerated beverages manufactured by them. The aerated beverages cannot be separated from bottles and crates. The bottles and crates are neither consumed nor sold but are returned. The glass bottles and plastic crates are both reusable and durable and are repeatedly used by the appellant. Moreover, it is alleged that the cost of the glass bottles and crates is amortized and included in the retail sale price of the aerated beverages. Hence, it was suggested that Octroi cannot be levied on the value of the glass bottles and crates and the impugned bills are, therefore, illegal and arbitrary.

6. The said challenge did not find favour with the High Court and the High Court after placing reliance on the judgment of this Court in the case of Acqueous Victuals Private Limited v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. reported at1 (1998) 5 SCC 474 dismissed the Writ Petition. However, liberty was granted to the appellant company to claim refund by filling appropriate application, in case, the bottles and crates are not sold, used, or consumed in the Municipal limits of the respondent-corporation, that is to say, if they have not finally rested in the Municipal limits of the respondent-corporation; and a further direction was issued that if such an application is filed, the same will be considered in its proper perspective by the concerned authority and if a case is made out the refund shall be granted.

7. We heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the parties at length. Similar submissions, as were made before the High Court, were also made before this Court. It was submitted by the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant that plastic crates and glass bottles are durable and reusable. They are used a number of times by the appellant. The bottles and crates are not sold. They are not consumed. The bottles are used but again sent out and refilled. The crates are also similarly sent back.

8. It was further submitted that as per the definition of the term octroi as found in Section 2(42) of the Bombay Provisional Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 (for short “BPMC Act”), “octroi” means a cess on the entry of goods into the limits of a city for consumption, use o


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top