SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1603

TARUN CHATTERJEE, R.M.LODHA
HOME CARE RETAIL MARTS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
NEW ERA FABRICS LIMITED – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 16-7-2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Bombay in Writ Petition No. 5756 of 2008 by which the High Court, in the exercise of its power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, had set aside the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the courts below by which an application for injunction filed by the appellant in a pending suit was allowed I in the manner indicated in the said order.

2. The appellant before us is the original plaintiff in the suit which has been filed for declaration and injunction. As noted here in earlier, against the order of the High Court setting aside the concurrent orders of the courts below allowing an application for injunction pending disposal of the suit, the appellant-plaintiff has come up to this Court by way of a special leave petition which on grant of leave was heard in the presence of the learned counsel for the parties.

3. We have heard Mr Shyam Divan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant-plaintiff and Dr. A.M. Singhvi, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent-defendant. We have examined the impugned order as well as the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top