EASEMENTS ACT, 1882
This Act may be called the Indian Easements Act, 1882.
Local extent. —It extends1 to the territories respectively administered by the Governor of Madras in Council and the Chief Commissioners of the Central Provinces and Coorg;
Commencement. —And it shall come into force on the first day of July 1882.
----------
1. The Act was extended to—
(1) Ajmer—Merwara by notification under section 5 of the Scheduled Districts Act, 1874 (14 of 1874), see Gazette of India, 1897, Pt. II. p. 1413;
(2) Bombay and the U.P. by Act 8 of 1891 and continues in force, with modifications in the territory transferred to Delhi State, see the Delhi Laws Act, 1915 (7 of 1915), sec.
The Easements Act, 1882, is a pivotal piece of legislation in India that governs the rights and obligations associated with easements and licenses. An easement is a right enjoyed by a property owner (dominant tenement) to use another person's property (servient tenement) for a specific purpose. This commentary focuses on Section 1 of the Act, which lays the foundation for the interpretation and application of the provisions contained within.
Section 1 of the Easements Act, 1882, provides the short title of the Act and states its applicability. It establishes that the Act may be called the "Indian Easements Act, 1882" and extends to the territories administered by the Government of India.
Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to affect any law not hereby expressly repealed; or to derogate from—
(a) any right of the 1[Government] to regulate the collection, retention and distribution of the water of rivers and streams flowing in natural channels, and of natural lakes and ponds, or of the water flowing, collected, retained or distributed in or by any channel or other work constructed at the public expense for irrigation;
(b) any customary or other right (not being a license) in or over immovable property which the 1[Government], the public or any person may possess irrespective of other immovable property; or
(c) any right acquired, or arising out of a relation created, before this Act comes into force.
--------------------
All references in any Act or Regulation to sections 26 and 27 of the Indian Limitation Act, 18772, or to sections 27 and 28 of Act No. IX of 18713, shall, in the territories to which this Act extends, be read as made to sections 15 and 16 of this Act.]
---------------------
1. Subs. by Act 10 of 1914, sec. 2 and Sch. I, for section 3.
2. Rep. by Act 9 of 1908.
3. Rep. by Act 15 of 1877.
The Easements Act, 1882, is a significant piece of legislation in India that governs the rights of individuals regarding the use of another person's property. Section 3 of the Act provides essential definitions and clarifications regarding the nature of easements, which are rights that allow a person to use the land of another for a specific purpose.
Section 3 of the Easements Act, 1882, outlines the construction of certain references to previous acts and clarifies the definitions relevant to easements. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the context in which easements are claimed and the rights associated with them.
The scope of Section 3 extends to defining the legal framework within which easements operate. It establishes the foundational principles that govern the rights and obligations of parties involved in easement disputes.
Section 3 does not prescribe any specific punishment. Instead, it serves as a guiding principle for interpreting easement rights and obligations under the law.
This commentary provides a comprehensive overview of Section 3 of the Easements Act, 1882, highlighting its significance in property law and the legal principles it establishes.
An easement is a right which the owner or occupier of certain land possesses, as such, for the beneficial enjoyment of that land, to do and continue to do something, or to prevent and continue to prevent something being done, in or upon, or in respect of, certain other land not his own.
Dominant and servient heritages and owners. —The land for the beneficial
enjoyment of which the right exists is called the dominant heritage, and the owner or occupier thereof the dominant owner; the land on which the liability is imposed is called the servient heritage, and the owner or occupier thereof the servient owner.
Explanation. —In the first and second clauses of this section, the expression “land” includes also things permanently attached to the earth; the expression “beneficial enjoyment” includes
Section 4 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, provides the fundamental legal definition and scope of what constitutes an easement. It forms the basis for understanding rights related to the beneficial use of land owned by another, and is central to property law and rights of way, light, water, and support.
Section 4 defines an easement as a right which the owner or occupier of certain land possesses, for the beneficial enjoyment of that land, to do or continue to do something, or to prevent or continue to prevent something being done, in or upon, or in respect of, other land not his own. It emphasizes that such rights are always appurtenant to the dominant land and are exercised over the servient land.
Section 33 of the Easements Act provides remedies for disturbance or interference with easements, including compensation or injunctions. The owner of the servient land can sue for damages or seek injunctions to prevent unlawful interference.
Section 4 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, provides a comprehensive legal framework for understanding easements as rights attached to land, emphasizing the necessity of clear distinction from ownership rights, the importance of the dominant-servient land relationship, and the methods of acquisition. Its principles underpin property disputes, rights of way, light, water, and other beneficial rights, with remedies available for infringement.
Easements are either continuous or discontinuous, apparent or non-apparent.
A continuous easement is one whose enjoyment is, or may be, continual without the act of man.
A discontinuous easement is one that needs the act of man for its enjoyment.
An apparent easement is one the existence of which is shown by some permanent sign which, upon careful inspection by a competent person, would be visible to him.
A non-apparent easement is one that has no such sign.
Illustrations
(a) A right annexed to B’s house to receive light by the windows without obstruction by his neighbour A. This is a continuous easement.
(b) A right
An easement may be permanent, or for a term of years or other limited period, or subject to periodical interruption, or exercisable only at a certain place, or at certain times, or between certain hours, or for a particular purpose, or on condition that it shall commence or become void or voidable on the happening of a specified event or the performance or non-performance of a specified Act.
Easements are restrictions of one or other of the following rights (namely):—
(a) Exclusive right to enjoy. —The exclusive right of every owner of immovable property (subject to any law for the time being in force) to enjoy and dispose of the same and all products thereof and accessions thereto.
(b) Rights to advantages arising from situation. —The right of every owner of immovable property (subject to any law for the time being in force) to enjoy without disturbance by another the natural advantages arising from its situation.
Illustrations of the Rights above referred to
(a) The exclusive right of every owner of land in a town to build on such land, subject to any municipal law for the time being in force.
&nb
An easement may be imposed by any one in the circumstances, and to the extent, in and to which he may transfer his interest in the heritage on which the liability is to be imposed.
Illustrations
(a) A is tenant of B’s land under a lease for an unexpired term of twenty years, and has power to transfer his interest under the lease. A may impose an easement on the land to continue during the time that the lease exists or for any shorter period.
(b) A is tenant for his life of certain land with remainder to B absolutely. A cannot, unless with B’s consent, impose an easement thereon which will continue after the determination of his life interest.
(c) A, B and C are co-owners of certain land. A cannot, without the consent of B and C, impose an easemen
Subject to the provisions of section 8, a servient owner may impose on the servient heritage any easement that does not lessen the utility of the existing easement. But he cannot, without the consent of the dominant owner, impose an easement on the servient heritage which would lessen such utility.
Illustrations
(a) A has in respect of his mill, a right to the uninterrupted flow thereto, from sunrise to noon, of the water of B’s stream. B may grant to C the right to divert the water of the stream from noon to sunset, provided that A’s supply is not thereby diminished.
(b) A has, in respect of his house, a right of way over B’s land. B may grant to C, as the owner of neighbouring farm, the right to feed his cattle on the grass growing on the way: provided that A’s right of way is not thereb
Subject to the provisions of section 8, a lessor may impose, on the property leased, any easement that does not derogate from the rights of the lessee as such, and a mortgagor may impose, on the property mortgaged, any easement that does not render the security insufficient. But a lessor or mortgagor cannot, without the consent of the lessee or mortgagee, impose any other easement on such property, unless it be to take effect on the termination of the lease of the redemption of the mortgage.
Explanation.—A security is insufficient within the meaning of this section unless the value of the mortgaged property exceeds by one-third, or, if consisting of building, exceeds by one-half, the amount for the time being due on the mortgage.
Section 10 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, deals with the authority of lessors and mortgagors to impose easements on leased properties, subject to certain conditions. It clarifies the scope within which easements can be created or restricted by property owners, ensuring that the rights of the lessee or mortgagee are not derogated beyond permissible limits.
Section 10 states that, subject to the provisions of Section 8, a lessor (landlord) or mortgagor may impose on the property leased or mortgaged any easement that does not interfere with the rights of the lessee or mortgagee. Essentially, it authorizes property owners to create easements for the benefit of their property, provided such easements do not derogate from the rights of the lessee or mortgagee.
Section 10 itself does not prescribe any punishment for violations. Instead, it sets the legal framework for the valid imposition of easements. Violations or unauthorized creation of easements can lead to legal disputes, injunctions, or claims for damages under general property or easement law.
Note: The references are based on the provided sources, primarily the general summaries and legal principles extracted from the search results.
No lessee or other person having a derivative interest may impose on the property held by him as such an easement to take effect after the expiration of his own interest, or in derogation of the right of the lessor or the superior proprietor.
An easement may be acquired by the owner of the immovable property for the beneficial enjoyment of which the right is created, or on his behalf, by any person in possession of the same.
One of two or more co-owners of immovable property may, as such, with or without the consent of the other or others, acquire an easement for the beneficial enjoyment of such property.
No lessee of immovable property can acquire, for the beneficial enjoyment of other immovable property of his own, an easement in or over the property comprised in his lease.
Where one person transfers or bequeaths immovable property to another,—
(a) If an easement in other immovable property of the transferor or testator is necessary for enjoying the subject of the transfer or bequest, the transferee or legatee shall be entitled to such easement; or
(b) If such an easement is apparent and continuous and necessary for enjoying the said subject as it was enjoyed when the transfer or bequest took effect, the transferee or legatee shall, unless a different intention is expressed or necessarily implied, be entitled to such easement; or
(c) if an easement in the subject of the transfer or bequest is necessary for enjoying other immovable property of the transferor or testator, the transferor or the legal representative of the testator shall be entitled to such
Section 13 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, lays down the legal principles governing easements of necessity and quasi-easements arising from transfers, bequests, or partition of immovable property. It provides the framework to determine when such easements are created by law, either explicitly or impliedly, based on the circumstances of property transfer and ownership.
Section 13 enumerates various scenarios where easements of necessity or quasi-easements are recognized:- When property is transferred or bequeathed, and an easement in the property of the transferor/testator is essential for the enjoyment of the transferred property (clauses a, c).- When an easement is apparent, continuous, and necessary for enjoyment as it was at the time of transfer or bequest (clauses b, d).- When partition of joint property occurs, and an easement over one share is necessary for enjoying another share (clauses e, f).- It also defines easements of necessity as those arising out of absolute necessity, not mere convenience, and emphasizes that such rights are created by law under specific circumstances.
The key ingredients for establishing an easement of necessity or quasi-easement under Section 13 include:- The property must have been transferred, bequeathed, or partitioned.- The easement must be necessary for the beneficial enjoyment of the property.- The easement should be apparent, continuous, and necessary as it was enjoyed at the time of transfer or partition.- The necessity must be absolute, not merely a matter of convenience.- The right should be based on prior relationship or usage, and not be created arbitrarily.
Section 13 covers:- Rights arising from transfers, bequests, and partition of joint property.- Implied or express easements of necessity and quasi-easements.- Rights of co-owners to use common pathways or underground drains.- The law recognizes rights acquired through long, uninterrupted, and peaceful enjoyment, provided they meet the criteria of necessity or continuity.- It also clarifies that such rights can be lost if they are not used for a certain period or if other legal provisions, like Section 41, come into play.
Section 13 itself does not prescribe any punishment; rather, it provides the legal basis for recognizing or denying easements of necessity and quasi-easements. Disputes arising under this section are adjudicated through civil suits, and courts determine the existence or extinction of such rights based on evidence and legal principles.
Section 13 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, provides a comprehensive legal framework for recognizing easements of necessity and quasi-easements arising from transfer, bequest, or partition. Courts require strict proof of absolute necessity, prior usage, and continuous enjoyment, with rights often extinguished by non-use or if alternative routes are available. The law aims to balance the rights of property owners with the necessity of unobstructed beneficial use, ensuring that easements are created and extinguished based on clear legal principles and evidence.
This concludes the legal commentary on Section 13 of the Easements Act, 1882.
When 1[a right] to a way of necessity is created under section 13, the transferor, the legal representative of the testator, or the owner of the share over which the right is exercised, as the case may be, is entitled to set out the way; but it must be reasonably convenient for the dominant owner.
When the person so entitled to set out the way refuses or neglects to do so, the dominant owner may set it out.
----------------------
1. Subs. by Act 12 of 1891, sec. 2 and Sch. II, for “right”.
Where the access and use of light or air to and for any building have been peaceably enjoyed therewith, as an easement, without interruption, and for twenty years, and where support from one person’s land or things affixed thereto, has been peaceably received by another person’s land subjected to artificial pressure is or by things affixed thereto, as an easement, without interruption, and for twenty years, and where a right of way or any other easement has been peaceably and openly enjoyed by any person claiming title thereto, as an easement and as of right, without interruption, and for twenty years, the right, to such access and use of light or air, support, or other easement, shall be absolute.
Each of the said periods of twenty years shall be taken to be a period ending within two years next before the institution of the suit wherein the claim to which such period relates is c
The Easements Act, 1882, governs the rights of individuals to use another's property for specific purposes. Section 15 specifically addresses the acquisition of easements by prescription, which allows a person to gain rights over a property through continuous and uninterrupted use over a statutory period.
Section 15 of the Easements Act states that an easement can be acquired by prescription if it has been enjoyed openly, peaceably, and without interruption for a period of twenty years. This provision emphasizes the importance of continuous use as a basis for claiming easementary rights.
Section 15 applies to various types of easements, including rights of way, light, air, and drainage. It establishes a legal framework for individuals to claim easementary rights based on long-term usage, thereby providing security and clarity in property rights.
There are no specific punishments outlined in Section 15 for violations. However, if a party obstructs an established easement, the affected party may seek legal remedies, including injunctions or declarations of their easementary rights.
This commentary highlights the critical aspects of Section 15 of the Easements Act, 1882, and the legal principles surrounding the acquisition of easementary rights by prescription.
Provided that, when any land upon, over or from which any easement has been enjoyed or derived has been held under or by virtue of any interest for life or any term of years exceeding three years from the granting thereof, the time of the enjoyment of such easement during the continuance of such interest or term shall be excluded in the computation of the said last-mentioned period of twenty years, in case the claim is, within three years next after the determination of such, interest or term, resisted by the person entitled, on such determination, to the said land.
Illustration
A sues for a declaration that he is entitled to a right of way over B’s land, A proves that he has enjoyed the right for twenty-five years. But B shows that during ten of these years C had a life-interest in the land; that on Cs death B became entitled to the
Easements acquired under section 15 are said to be acquired by prescription, and are called prescriptive rights.
None of the following rights can be so acquired:—
(a) a right which would tend to the total destruction of the subject of the right, or the property on which, if the acquisition were made, liability would be imposed;
(b) a right to the free passage of light or air to an open space of ground;
(c) a right to surface-water not flowing in a stream and not permanently collected in a pool, tank or otherwise;
(d) a right to underground water not passing in a defined channel.
The Indian Easements Act, 1882, governs the rights and obligations related to easements in India. Section 17 specifically addresses the limitations on the acquisition of easementary rights by prescription, outlining certain rights that cannot be acquired under any circumstances. This section is crucial for understanding the boundaries of easementary rights and the legal principles that govern property disputes.
Section 17 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, delineates the rights that cannot be acquired by prescription. It states that no easementary right can be acquired for:- (a) A right that would lead to the total destruction of the subject of the right.- (b) A right to the free passage of light or air to an open space.- (c) A right to surface water not flowing in a stream and not permanently collected in a pool, tank, or otherwise.- (d) A right to underground water not passing in a defined channel.
The scope of Section 17 is significant as it protects certain natural rights and prevents the acquisition of rights that could lead to the destruction of property or natural resources. It serves as a safeguard against claims that could disrupt the balance of property rights.
Section 17 does not prescribe any punishment per se, as it is not a penal provision. Instead, it serves as a legal barrier against the establishment of certain easementary rights that could be detrimental to property owners.
This commentary provides a comprehensive overview of Section 17 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, highlighting its significance in property law and the protection it offers to property owners against certain claims.
An easement may be acquired in virtue of a local custom. Such easements are called customary easements.
Illustrations
(a) By the custom of a certain village every cultivator of village land is entitled, as such, to graze his cattle on the common pasture. A having become the tenant of a plot of uncultivated land in the village breaks up and cultivates that plot. He thereby acquires an easement to graze his cattle in accordance with the custom.
(b) By the custom of a certain town no owner or occupier of a house can open a new window therein so as substantially to invade his neighbour’s privacy. A builds a house in the town near B’s house. A thereupon acquires an easement that B shall not open new windows in his house so as to command a view of the portions of A’s house which are ordinarily excl
Where the dominant heritage is transferred or devolves, by act of parties or by operation of law, the transfer or devolution shall, unless a contrary intention appears, be deemed to pass the easement to the person in whose favour the transfer or devolution takes place.
Illustration
A has certain land to which a right of way is annexed. A lets the land to B for twenty years. The right of way vests in B and his legal representatives so long as the lease continues.
The rules contained in this Chapter are controlled by any contract between the dominant and servient owners relating to the servient heritage, and by the provisions of the instrument or decree, if any, by which the easement referred to was imposed.
Incidents of customary easements.—And when any incident of any customary easement is inconsistent with such rules, nothing in this Chapter shall affect such incident.
An easement must not be used of any purpose not connected with the enjoyment of the dominant heritage.
Illustrations
(a) A, as owner of a farm Y, has a right of way over B’s land to Y. Lying beyond Y, A has another farm Z, the beneficial enjoyment of which is not necessary for the beneficial enjoyment of Y. He must not use the easement for the purpose of passing to and from Z.
(b) A, as owner of a certain house, has a right of way to and from it. For the purpose of passing to and from the house, the right may be used, not only by A, but by the members of his family, his guests, lodgers, servants, workmen, visitors and customers; for this is a purpose, connected with the enjoyment of the dominant heritage. So, if A lets the house, he may use the right of way for the purpose of collecting the
The dominant owner must exercise his right in the mode which is least onerous to the servient owner; and, when the exercise of an easement can without detriment to the dominant owner be confined to a determinate part of the servient heritage, such exercise shall, at the request of the servient owner, be so confined.
Illustrations
(a) A has a right of way over B’s field, A must enter the way at either end and not at any intermediate point.
(b) A has a right annexed to his house to cut thatching grass in B’s swamp. A when exercising his easement must cut the grass so that the plants may not be destroyed.
Section 22 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, governs the exercise of easements, particularly emphasizing that such rights must be exercised in a manner that imposes the least burden on the servient owner. It aims to balance the rights of the dominant owner with the rights and convenience of the servient owner, ensuring that easements are not exercised in a manner that causes unnecessary hardship or damage.
Section 22 mandates that the exercise of an easement must be confined to the mode which is least onerous to the servient owner. The dominant owner has the right to alter the mode and place of enjoyment of the easement, but only within the bounds of minimizing burden and interference. It also emphasizes that the right should be exercised without causing unnecessary damage or obstruction, and the exercise must be in accordance with the mode least burdensome to the servient tenement.
Section 22 applies to all easements where the exercise can be confined to a specific part of the servient heritage. It limits the manner in which easements are exercised, ensuring they do not cause undue harm. The section also permits the alteration of the mode and place of enjoyment, but such alterations must be least burdensome. It is applicable both in cases of express grants and long-standing customary easements, as well as in cases of disputes over the exercise or scope of rights.
Section 22 itself does not prescribe any punishment. Instead, violations or improper exercise of easements under this section can lead to civil remedies such as injunctions, damages, or removal of obstructions. Courts may also interpret violations as wrongful acts entitling the servient owner to seek legal redress.
Balance of Rights - Section 22 ensures a balance between the rights of the dominant and servient owners by mandating least onerous exercise of easements. - [Fakiravva VS Shivabasayya Siddalingayya Odusumath]
Mode of Exercise - The dominant owner must exercise his right in the mode which is least burdensome to the servient owner, preventing undue interference. -
Alteration of Mode - The section permits the dominant owner to alter the mode and place of enjoyment, but only within limits that do not increase burden or damage. -
Confinement of Exercise - Rights of easement can be confined to a determinate part of the servient heritage, restricting unnecessary encroachment. -
No Unnecessary Damage - Exercise of easements should not cause unnecessary damage or obstruction, fostering a harmonious balance. -
Customary Easements - The section recognizes incidents of customary easements, which are exercised in accordance with long-standing usage, provided they do not contravene the principles of least burden. -
Alteration Rights - The dominant owner can change the mode of enjoyment, but such changes must be least onerous and within reason. -
Restrictions on Use - The servient owner is protected from excessive or arbitrary use of the easement that causes undue hardship. -
Legal Remedies - Violations of Section 22 can be remedied through civil actions such as injunctions, damages, or removal of obstructions. - [Bhausaheb VS Yashwant]
Applicability to Rights of Way - Section 22 primarily applies to rights of way, emphasizing that such rights must be exercised without causing unnecessary burden. - [Thilakarj Thilakan VS P J Sebastian ]
Exercise Without Detriment - The section emphasizes that the exercise of easements should not be detrimental to the servient owner’s enjoyment or property. - [Karunaiananda Nadar VS V. S. V. Senthiappa Nadar]
Confined Exercise - The exercise of rights should be confined to the specific part of the servient heritage that is necessary for the enjoyment of the easement. - [M. Venkatarama Ayyar VS A. Rangaswamy Ayyar]
Legal Interpretation - Courts interpret Section 22 strictly to prevent arbitrary or excessive exercise of easements, ensuring the rights are exercised reasonably. - [Ramapriya Hotel (P) Ltd. VS Trivandrum Specialists Hospitals Private Limited, Pattom Thiruvananthapuram Represented By Its Managing Director Dr. C. Bharathchandran]
Impact of Long Use - Long-standing use or prescription does not override the obligation to exercise easements in the least burdensome manner. - [Gopalbhai Jikabhai Suvagiya VS Vinubhai Nathabhai Hirani]
Dispute Resolution - Disputes under Section 22 often involve whether the mode of exercise imposes unnecessary burden or damage, which courts resolve based on facts and reasonableness. - [K. S. Nanjappa Gounder VS K. P. Kandasamy]
Restrictions on Substitution - Servient owners cannot be compelled to accept new pathways or modes that cause increased burden, unless expressly agreed. - [Sanjeet Singh VS Kamlesh Singh]
Legal Principle - The core principle is that easements are to be exercised with the least possible interference, preserving the rights of both parties. -
This commentary synthesizes judicial interpretations and legal principles derived from the provided sources, emphasizing the balanced and reasonable exercise of easements under Section 22 of the Easements Act, 1882.
Subject to the provisions of section 22, the dominant owner may, from time to time, alter the mode and place of enjoying the easement, provided that he does not thereby impose any additional burden on the servient heritage.
Exception.—The dominant owner of a right of way cannot vary his line of passage at pleasure, even though he does not thereby impose any additional burden on the servient heritage.
"Illustrations
(a) A, the owner of a saw-mill, has a right to a flow of water sufficient to work the mill. He may convert the saw-mill into a corn-mill; provided that it can be worked by the same amount of water.
(b) A has a right to discharge on B’s land the rain-water from the eaves of A’s house. This does not entitle A to advance his eaves if, by so
The dominant owner is entitled1, as against the servient owner, to do all acts necessary to secure the full enjoyment of the easement; but such acts must be done at such time and in such manner as, without detriment to the dominant owner, to cause the servient owner as little inconvenience as possible; and the dominant owner must repair, as far as practicable, the damage (if any) caused by the act to the servient heritage.
Accessory rights.—Rights to do acts necessary to secure the full enjoyment of an easement are called accessory rights.
Illustrations
(a) A has an easement to lay pipes in B’s land to convey water to A’s cistern. A may enter and dig the land in order to mend the pipes, but he must restore the surface to its original state.
(b) A
The expenses incurred in constructing works, or making repairs, or doing any other act necessary for the use or preservation of an easement, must be defrayed by the dominant owner.
Where an easement is enjoyed by means of an artificial work, the dominant owner is liable to make compensation for any damage to the servient heritage arising from the want of repair of such work1.
---------------------------
1. But see section 50, infra, as to extinguishment or suspension of easement.
The servient owner is not bound to do anything for the benefit of the dominant heritage, and he is entitled, as against the dominant owner, to use the servient heritage in any way consistent with the enjoyment of the easement; but he must not do any act tending to restrict the easement or to render its exercise less convenient.
convenient."
Illustrations
(a) A, as owner of a house has a right to lead water and send sewage through B’s land. B is not bound, as servient owner, to clear the water course or scour the sewer.
(b) A grants a right of way through his land to B as owner of a field. A may feed his cattle on grass growing on the way, provided that B’s right of way is not thereby obstructed; but he must not build a wall at the end of his land s
With respect to the extent of easements and the mode of their enjoyment, the following provisions shall take effect:—
Easement of necessity. —An easement of necessity is co-extensive with the necessity as it existed when the easement was imposed.
Other easements. —The extent of any other easement and the mode of its enjoyment must be fixed with reference to the probable intention of the parties, and the purpose for which the right was imposed or acquired.
In the absence of evidence as to such intention and purpose—
(a) Right of way. —A right of way of any one kind does not include a right of way of any other kind;
(b) Right to light or air acquired by grant. —The extent of a right to the passage of l
The dominant owner cannot, by merely altering or adding to the dominant heritage, substantially increase an easement.
Where an easement has been granted or bequeathed so that its extent shall be proportionate to the extent of the dominant heritage, if the dominant heritage is increased by alluvion, the easement is proportionately increased, and if the dominant heritage is diminished by dilluvion, the easement is proportionately diminished.
Save as aforesaid, no easement is effected by any change in the extent of the dominant or the servient heritage.
Illustrations
(a) A, the owner of a mill, has acquired a prescriptive right, to divert to his mill part of the water of a stream. A alters the machinery of his mill. He cannot thereby increase his righ
Where a dominant heritage is divided between two or more persons, the easement becomes annexed to each of the shares, but not so as to increase substantially the burden on the servient heritage: Provided that such annexation is consistent with the terms of the instrument, decree or revenue-proceeding (if any) under which the division was made, and in the case of prescriptive rights, with the user during the prescriptive period.
Illustrations
(a) A house to which a right of way by a particular path is annexed is divided into two parts, one of which is granted to A, the other to B. Each is entitled, in respect of his part, to a right of way by the same path.
(b) A house to which is annexed the right of drawing water from a well to the extent of fifty buckets a day is divided into two distinct he
In the case of excessive user of an easement the servient owner may, without prejudice to any other remedies to which he may be entitled, obstruct the user, but only on the servient heritage: Provided that such user cannot be obstructed when the obstruction would interfere with the lawful enjoyment of the easement.
Illustration
A, having a right to the free passage over B’s land of light to four windows, 6’ X 4’, increases their size and number. It is impossible to obstruct the passage of light to the new windows without also obstructing the passage of light to the ancient windows. B cannot obstruct the excessive user.
The owner or occupier of the dominant heritage is entitled to enjoy the easement without disturbance by any other person.
Illustration
A, as owner of a house has a right of way over B’s land. C unlawfully enters on B’s land and obstructs A in his right of way. A may sue C for compensation, not for the entry, but for the obstruction.
The owner of any interest in the dominant heritage, or the occupier of such heritage, may institute a suit for compensation for the disturbance of the easement or of any right accessory thereto:
Provided that the disturbance has actually caused substantial damage to the plaintiff.
Explanation I.—The doing of any act likely to injure the plaintiff by affecting the evidence of the easement, or by materially diminishing the value of the dominant heritage, is substantial damage within the meaning of this section and section 34.
Explanation II.—Where the easement disturbed is a right to the free passage of light passing to the openings in a house, no damage is substantial within the meaning of this section unless it falls within the first Explanation, or interferes materially with the physical com
Section 33 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, governs the rights of owners or occupiers of dominant heritage to seek compensation or relief for disturbance of their easements, especially when such disturbance causes substantial damage. This section plays a crucial role in balancing the rights of easement holders against acts that interfere with their lawful use and enjoyment of property.
Section 33 provides that:- The owner or occupier of a dominant heritage can institute a suit for compensation for disturbance of an easement or accessory right.- Such a suit can only be maintained if the disturbance has caused substantial damage.- The section includes explanations clarifying what constitutes substantial damage, notably affecting the evidence of the easement or diminishing the value of the heritage, or materially interfering with physical comfort or business.
In summary, Section 33 of the Easements Act, 1882, establishes a framework for redress against acts disturbing easements, emphasizing substantial damage as a prerequisite. The section balances the rights of property owners with the need to prevent frivolous claims, requiring proof of material interference or injury to physical comfort or property value before courts grant relief.
The removal of the means of support to which a dominant owner is entitled does not give rise to a right to recover compensation unless and until substantial damage is actually sustained.
Subject to the provisions of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 (1 of 1877)1, sections 52 to 57 (both inclusive), an injunction may be granted to restrain the disturbance of an easement—
(a) if the easement is actually disturbed — when compensation for such disturbance might be recovered under this Chapter;
(b) if the disturbance is only threatened or intended — when the act threatened or intended must necessarily, if performed, disturb the easement.
-------------------------
1. See now the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (47 of 1963).
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 24, the dominant owner cannot himself abate a wrongful obstruction of an easement.
When from a cause which preceded the imposition of an easement, the person by whom it was imposed ceases to have any right in the servient heritage, the easement is extinguished.
Exception.—Nothing in this section applies to an easement lawfully imposed by a mortgagor in accordance with section 10.
Illustrations
(a) A transfers Sultanpur to B on condition that he does not marry C, B imposes an easement on Sultanpur. Then B marries C, B’s interest in Sultanpur ends, and with it the Bs interest in Sultanpur ends, and with it the easement is extinguished.
(b) A, in 1860, let Sultanpur to B for thirty years from the date of the lease. B, in 1861, imposes an easement on the land in favour of C, who enjoys the easement peaceably and openly as an easement
An easement is extinguished when the dominant owner releases it, expressly or impliedly, to the servient owner.
Such release can be made only in the circumstances and to the extent in and to which the dominant owner can alienate the dominant heritage.
An easement may be released as to part only of the servient heritage.
Explanation I.—An easement is impliedly released—
(a) where the dominant owner expressly authorises an act of a permanent nature to be done on the servient heritage, the necessary consequence of which is to prevent his future enjoyment of the easement, and such act is done in pursuance of such authority;
(b) where any permanent alteration is made in the dominant heritage of such a na
An easement is extinguished when the servient owner, in exercise of a power reserved in this behalf, revokes the easement.
An easement is extinguished where it has been imposed for a limited period, or acquired on condition that it shall become void on the performance or non-performance of a specified act, and the period expires or the condition is fulfilled.
An easement of necessity is extinguished when the necessity comes to an end.
Illustration
A grants B a field inaccessible except by passing over A’s adjoining land. B afterwards purchases a part of that land over which he can pass to his field. The right of way over A’s land which B had acquired is extinguished.
An easement is extinguished when it becomes incapable of being at any time and under any circumstances beneficial to the dominant owner.
Where, by any permanent change in the dominant heritage, the burden on the servient heritage is materially increased and cannot be reduced by the servient owner without interfering with the lawful enjoyment of the easement, the easement is extinguished unless—
(a) it was intended for the beneficial enjoyment of the dominant heritage, to whatever extent the easement should be used; or
(b) the injury caused to the servient owner by the change is so slight that no reasonable person would complain of it; or
(c) the easement is an easement of necessity.
Nothing in this section shall be deemed to apply to an easement entitling the dominant owner to support of the dominant heritage.
An easement is extinguished where the servient heritage is by superior force so permanently altered that the dominant owner can no longer enjoy such easement:
Provided that, where a way of necessity is destroyed by superior force, the dominant owner has a right to another way over the servient heritage; and the provisions of section 14 apply to such way.
Illustrations
(a) A grants to B, as the owner of a certain house, a right to fish in a river running through A’s land. The river changes its course permanently and runs through C’s land. B’s easement is extinguished.
(b) Access to a path over which A has a right of way is permanently cut off by an earthquake. A’s right is extinguished.
An easement is extinguished when either the dominant or the servient heritage is completely destroyed.
Illustration
A has a right of way over a road running along the foot of a sea-cliff. The road is washed away by a permanent encroachment of the sea. A’s easement is extinguished.
An easement is extinguished when the same person becomes entitled to the absolute ownership of the whole of the dominant and servient heritages.
Illustrations
(a) A, as the owner of a house, has a right of way over B’s field. A mortgages his house, and B mortgages his field to C. Then C forecloses both mortgages and becomes thereby absolute owner of both house and field. The right of way is extinguished.
(b) The dominant owner acquires only part of the servient heritage; the easement is not extinguished, except in the case illustrated in section 41.
(c) The servient owner acquires the dominant heritage in connection with a person; the easement is not extinguished.
(d) The separate owners of two separate d
A continuous easement is extinguished when it totally ceases to be enjoyed as such for an unbroken period of twenty years.
A discontinuous easement is extinguished when, for a like period, it has not been enjoyed as such.
Such period shall be reckoned, in the case of a continuous easement, from the day on which its enjoyment was obstructed by the servient owner or rendered impossible by the dominant owner; and, in the case of a discontinuous easement, from the day on which it was last enjoyed by any person as dominant owner:
Provided that if, in the case of a discontinuous easement the dominant owner, within such period, registers, under the Indian Registration Act, 1877 (3 of 1877)1, a declaration of his intention to retain such easement, it shall not be extinguished until a period of twenty
When an easement is extinguished, the rights (if any) accessory thereto are also extinguished.
Illustration
A has an easement to draw water from B’s well. As accessory thereto, he has a right of way over B’s land to and from the well. The easement to draw water is extinguished under section 47. The right of way is also extinguished.
An easement is suspended when the dominant owner becomes entitled to possession of the servient heritage for a limited interest therein, or when the servient owner becomes entitled to possession of the dominant heritage for a limited interest therein.
Section 49 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, deals with the suspension of easements, which are rights enjoyed over the land of another for beneficial purposes. It is a key provision that outlines circumstances under which an easement can be temporarily halted, affecting the rights of the dominant and servient owners.
Section 49 states:"An easement is suspended when the dominant owner becomes entitled to possession of the servient heritage for a limited interest therein, or when the servient owner is entitled to possession for a limited interest, or when the easement is otherwise suspended by law or agreement."It further elaborates that the easement remains suspended until the conditions causing suspension cease to exist.
Section 49 applies to cases where possession rights are temporarily transferred or limited, such as:- When the dominant owner acquires possession for a limited period.- When the servient owner is entitled to possession for a limited purpose.- When easements are suspended due to legal or contractual provisions.It does not cover permanent extinguishment of easements, which is addressed under other sections like Section 45.
Section 49 does not prescribe any punishment. It is a procedural and substantive provision that defines the circumstances of suspension, not penal sanctions.
Note: This commentary synthesizes the legal principles derived from the provided sources and relevant case law to offer a comprehensive understanding of Section 49 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882.
The servient owner has no right to require that an easement be continued; and, notwithstanding the provisions of section 26, he is not entitled to compensation for damage caused to the servient heritage in consequence of the extinguishment or suspension of the easement, if the dominant owner has given to the servient owner such notice as will enable him, without unreasonable expense, to protect the servient heritage from such damage.
Compensation for damage caused by extinguishment or suspension.—Where such notice has not been given, the servient owner is entitled to compensation for damage caused to the servient heritage in consequence of such extinguishment or suspension.
Illustration
A, in exercise of an easement, diverts to his canal the water of B’s stream. The diversion continues for ma
An easement extinguished under section 45 revives (a) when the destroyed heritage is, before twenty years have expired, restored by the deposit of alluvion; (b) when the destroyed heritage is a servient building and before twenty years have expired such building is rebuilt upon the same site, and (c) when the destroyed heritage is a dominant building and before twenty years have expired such building is rebuilt upon the same site and in such a manner as not to impose a greater burden on the servient heritage.
An easement extinguished under section 46 revives when the grant or bequest by which the unity of ownership was produced is set aside by the decree of a competent Court. A necessary easement extinguished under the same section revives when the unity of ownership ceases from any other cause.
A suspended easement revives if the cause
Where one person grants to another, or to a definite number of other persons, a right to do, or continue to do, in or upon the immovable property of the grantor, something which would, in the absence of such right, be unlawful, and such right does not amount to an easement or an interest in the property, the right is called a license.
A license may be granted by any one in the circumstances and to the extent in and to which he may transfer his interests in the property affected by the license.
The grant of a license may be expressed or implied from the conduct of the grantor, and an agreement which purports to create an easement, but is ineffectual for that purpose, may operate to create a license.
All licenses necessary for the enjoyment of any interest, or the exercise of any right, are implied in the constitution of such interest or right. Such licenses are called accessory licenses.
Illustration
A sells the trees growing on his land to B. B is entitled to go on the land and take away the trees.
Unless a different intention is expressed or necessarily implied, a license to attend a place of public entertainment may be transferred by the licensee; but, save as aforesaid, a license cannot be transferred by the licensee or exercised by his servants or agents.
Illustrations
(a) A grants B a right to walk over A s field whenever he pleases. The right is not annexed to any immovable property of B . The right cannot be transferred.
(b) The Government grant B a license to erect and use temporary grain-sheds on Government land. In the absence of express provision to the contrary, B s servants may enter on the land for the purpose of erecting sheds, erect the same, deposit grain therein and remove grain therefrom.
The grantor of a license is bound to disclose to the licensee any defect in the property affected by the license, likely to be dangerous to the person or property of the licensee, of which the grantor is, and the licensee is not, aware.
The grantor of a license is bound not to do anything likely to render the property affected by the license dangerous to the person or property of the licensee.
When the grantor of the license transfers the property affected thereby, the transferee is not as such bound by the license.
A license may be revoked by the grantor, unless—
(a) it is coupled with a transfer of property and such transfer is in force;
(b) the licensee, acting upon the license, has executed a work of a permanent character and incurred expenses in the execution.
The revocation of a license may be express or implied.
Illustrations
(a) A, the owner of a field, grants a license to B, to use a path across it. A, with intent to revoke the license, locks a gate across the path. The license is revoked.
(b) A, the owner of a field, grants a license to B to stack hay on the field. A lets or sells the field to C. The license is revoked.
A license is deemed to be revoked—
(a) when, from a cause preceding the grant of it, the grantor ceases to have any interest in the property affected by the license;
(b) when the licensee releases it, expressly or impliedly, to the grantor or his representative;
(c) where it has been granted for a limited period, or acquired on condition that it shall become void on the performance or non-performance of a specified act, and the period expires, or the condition is fulfilled;
(d) where the property affected by the license is destroyed or by superior force so permanently altered that the licensee can no longer exercise his right;
(e) where the licensee becomes entitled to the absolute ownershi
Where a license is revoked, the licensee is entitled to a reasonable time to leave the property affected thereby and to remove any goods which he has been allowed to place on such property.
Where a license has been granted for a consideration, and the licensee, without any fault of his own, is evicted by the grantor before he has fully enjoyed, under the license, the right for which he contracted, he is entitled to recover compensation from the grantor.
Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency, precision, and security, tailored exclusively for legal professionals.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
AI Assistant
