ANIL R.DAVE, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
Registrar General, High Court of Madras – Appellant
Versus
M. Manickam – Respondent
Please provide the legal document content (insert it within
JUDGMENT
Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. —
1. Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. The present appeals are filed against the judgments and orders dated 15.03.2007 and 21.07.2007 in Second Appeal No. 1064 of 2005, and Review Petition No. 19 of 2007, respectively, passed by the Madras High Court whereby it dismissed the second appeal and the review petition filed by the appellant herein accepting the contentions raised by the Respondent No. 1. By its judgments and orders aforementioned, the High Court set aside the judgment and decree of Subordinate Court and restored the judgment and decree of District Munsif Court dated 09.10.2002.
4. The facts leading to the filing of the present appeals are that the Respondent No. 1- M. Manickam joined the State Subordinate Judicial Service as District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate on 04.11.1988, after getting duly selected for the said post by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission. It is alleged by the Respondent No. 1 that in his service records, his date of birth has been entered as 19.03.1947, as found in the S.S.L.C. Book, whereas his actual date of birth is 24.11.1950 and that due to the wrong entry of his date of birth in the service recor
Union of India Vs. Harnam Singh reported in (1993) 2 SCC 162
State of Punjab Vs. Mohinder Singh reported in (2005) 3 SCC 702
State of U.P. v. Shiv Narayan Upadhyaya reported in (2005) 6 SCC 49
Ramdeo Chauhan alias Raj Nath v. State of Assam reported in (2001) 5 SCC 714
Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh Vs. Megh Raj Garg and Another reported in (2010) 6 SCC 482
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.