H.L.DATTU, D.K.JAIN
Chandna Impex Pvt. Limited – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
D.K. Jain, J. —
1. Challenge in this appeal under Section 130-E of the Customs Act, 1962 ( for short “the Act”), by the importer, is to the final order dated 2nd September, 2009, passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in CUSAA No. 7/2009. By the impugned order the High Court has dismissed appellant’s appeal under Section 130 of the Act on the ground that no substantial question of law arises from the order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “the Tribunal”) in appeal Nos.C/920-22/2005, for its consideration.
2. To appreciate the controversy involved a brief reference to the facts, as found by the Tribunal, would be necessary. These are:
The appellant, a body corporate, is engaged in the business of import of plywood, inlays, MDF laminated boards and veneer sheets etc. On 22nd May, 2000, one of the directors of the appellant, namely, Rakesh Chandna, was apprehended by the officers of the Customs department at Calcutta Airport. He was found in possession of US $45,000/- and Indian currency of ‘9,000/-, alongwith several incriminating documents, which fuelled further follow up action by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (for short
Konia Trading Co. v. Commissioner of Customs, Jaipur
West Bengal Electricity Regulatory Commission v. CESC LTD.
State of Orissa v. Dhaniram Luhar
Sir Chunilal V. Mehta & Sons Ltd. v. Century Spinning & Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
Hero Vinoth (Minor) v. Seshammal
Metroark Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Calcutta
Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) v. Vijay Dasharath Patel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.