SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 1141

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, A.K.PATNAIK
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Jasvir Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.V. Raveendran, J.

1. Leave granted. Heard.

2. In regard to acquisition of the lands of 45 Respondents under notifications dated 18.8.1981 and 14.11.1981 issued under Section 4(1) and Section 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ('Act' for short), the LAO had made an award offering a compensation of ` 12000/- per acre which was increased to ` 17000/-per acre by the Reference Court, and to ` 30,000/- per acre by the Allahabad High Court. On further appeal by the Respondents, this Court by order dated 12.9.2005 set aside the judgment dated 29.1.2004 of the High Court and remanded the matter to the High Court for fresh decision on merits in regard to quantum and statutory benefits, in accordance with law. This Court also observed that since the appeals were old, the High Court will have to take steps to dispose the appeals expeditiously. We are informed that the appeals (FA No. 880 of 1993 and FA No. 401 of 1998) are still pending consideration by the High Court.

3. The Respondents thereafter filed a writ petition (No. 77449 of 2005) seeking a direction for issue of a fresh notification under Sections 4 and 6 of the Act, after setting aside the notifications dated 18.8.1981 and 14.11
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top