J.M.PANCHAL, B.S.CHAUHAN
Sawaran Lata – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
Judgment :
Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.
1. These special leave petitions reveal a very sorry state of affair and make it evident that litigants are eager to abuse the process of the Court, having no idea for the law of limitation/delay and laches.
2. These special leave petitions have been filed against the judgment and order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 30.5.2009 by which the Civil Writ Petition Nos.8794 of 2009 and 8761 of 2009 have been dismissed only on the ground of delay. The Review Petitions were filed which were also time barred by 48 days. The same stood dismissed vide order dated 25.9.2009. These special leave petitions have been filed with an inordinate delay of 172 days. Petitioners sought relief of quashing the land acquisition proceedings in respect of which the award had been made under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter called as "Act 1894") on 27.4.2004.
3. The facts and circumstances giving rise to these petitions are that the respondent State of Haryana issued a notification under Section 4 of Act 1894 in respect of a huge chunk of land including some land of the petitioners on 2nd May, 2001. Substance of the said notification was publ
Aflatoon v. Lt. Governor, Delhi
State of Mysore v. V.K. Kangan
PT. Girdharan Prasad Missir v. State of Bihar
State of Orissa v. Dhobei Sethi
State of Maharashtra v. Digambar
State of Tamil Nadu v. L. Krishnan
C. Padma v. Dy. Secretary to Govt. of Tamil Nadu
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Industrial Development Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.