SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 510

G.S.SINGHVI, K.S.P.RADHAKRISHNAN
Prema – Appellant
Versus
Nanje Gowda – Respondent


JUDGMENT

G.S. Singhvi, J.

1. The question which arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the Appellant, who failed in her challenge to the preliminary decree passed in a suit for partition filed by Respondent No. 1 can seek enhancement of her share in the joint family property in the final decree proceedings in terms of Section 6A inserted in the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (for short, "the Act") by the Hindu Succession (Karnataka Amendment) Act, 1990, which received Presidential assent on 28.7.1994 and was published in the Karnataka Gazette dated 30.7.1994.

2. The suit for partition and separate possession of his share filed by Respondent No. 1, which came to be registered as O.S. No. 425 of 1989, was decreed by Munsiff, Srirangapatna (hereinafter described as, `the trial Court') vide judgment dated 11.8.1992. The trial Court held that Plaintiff Respondent No. 1 and Defendant No. 3 are entitled to 2/7th share and Defendant Nos. 1, 4, 5 and 6 are entitled to 1/28th share each.

3. Regular Appeal No. 69 of 1992 jointly filed by the Appellant, who was Defendant No. 6 in the suit and Defendant Nos. 1, 4 and 5 was dismissed by Civil Judge (Senior Division), Srirangapatna (hereinaft




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top