G.S.SINGHVI, K.S.P.RADHAKRISHNAN
Prema – Appellant
Versus
Nanje Gowda – Respondent
JUDGMENT
G.S. Singhvi, J.
1. The question which arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the Appellant, who failed in her challenge to the preliminary decree passed in a suit for partition filed by Respondent No. 1 can seek enhancement of her share in the joint family property in the final decree proceedings in terms of Section 6A inserted in the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (for short, "the Act") by the Hindu Succession (Karnataka Amendment) Act, 1990, which received Presidential assent on 28.7.1994 and was published in the Karnataka Gazette dated 30.7.1994.
2. The suit for partition and separate possession of his share filed by Respondent No. 1, which came to be registered as O.S. No. 425 of 1989, was decreed by Munsiff, Srirangapatna (hereinafter described as, `the trial Court') vide judgment dated 11.8.1992. The trial Court held that Plaintiff Respondent No. 1 and Defendant No. 3 are entitled to 2/7th share and Defendant Nos. 1, 4, 5 and 6 are entitled to 1/28th share each.
3. Regular Appeal No. 69 of 1992 jointly filed by the Appellant, who was Defendant No. 6 in the suit and Defendant Nos. 1, 4 and 5 was dismissed by Civil Judge (Senior Division), Srirangapatna (hereinaft
Gyarsi Bai v. Dhansukh Lal AIR 1965 SC 1055
S. Sai Reddy v. S. Narayana Reddy (1991) 3 SCC 647
Phoolchand v. Gopal Lal AIR 1967 SC 1470
S. Narayana Reddy v. S. Sai Reddy AIR 1990 AP 263
Parshuram Rajaram Tiwari v. Hirabai Rajaram Tiwari AIR 1957 Bom 59
Jadunath Roy and Ors. v. Parameswar Mullick and Ors. AIR 1940 PC 11
Venkata Reddy v. Pethi Reddy AIR 1963 SC 992
Kusum Kumari v. Debi Prosad Dhandhania 63 Ind App 114 : AIR 1936 PC 63
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.