G.S.SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Mahesh Kumar (Dead) By L. Rs. – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
G. S. Singhvi, J.
1. These appeals are directed against judgment dated 22.7.2004 of the learned Single Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court whereby he allowed the appeals filed by respondent No.1 - Vinod Kumar and respondent No.2 - Anand Kumar, set aside judgment and decree dated 21.11.2002 passed by II Additional District Judge (Fast Track), Harda (hereinafter described as the ‘trial Court’) and decreed the suit filed by respondent No.1 for declaration, possession, permanent injunction and recovery of rent in respect of the share of Shri Harishankar (father of the appellant and respondent Nos.1 and 2) in the joint family property. The learned Single Judge also declared that respondent No.2 shall be entitled to possession of his share in the suit property in terms of Will dated 9.6.1989 (Ex. P-1) executed by Shri Harishankar.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are being referred to as the appellant and the respondents.
3. Appellant Mahesh Kumar who is now represented by his legal representatives, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and their father were members of the joint family. In 1965, respondent No.2 took his share and separated from the joint family. After 20 years
Uma Devi Nambiar v. T. C. Sidhan
H. Venkatachala Iyengar v. B. N. Thimmajamma
Rani Purnima Devi v. Kumar Khagendra Narayan Dev
Ramchandra Rambux v. Champabai
Surendra Pal v. Dr. (Mrs.) Saraswati Arora
Lalitaben Jayantilal Popat v. Pragnaben Jamnadas Kataria
S. R. Srinivasa v. S. Padmavathamma
Balathandayutham v. Ezhilarasan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.