SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 258

Supreme Court of India
G.S. SINGHVI & SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Saroj Screens Pvt. Ltd.
Versus
Ghanshyam & Others
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3107-3108 OF 2012 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 36724-36725 of 2009)
Decided on : 26-03-2012

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:Gagan Sanghi, Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Advocates. For the Respondents:Shekhar Naphade, Ashok Shrivastav, Senior Advocates, Manish Pitale, G.K. Sarda, Chander Shekhar Ashri, Somnath Padhan, Satyajit A. Desai, Sanjay V. Kharde, Advocates.

Headnote:Transfer of Property Act, 1882–Section 116–City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948–Section 70–Lease–Cancellation of lease on ground of lack of previous sanction of State Government–Before granting 30 years lease of plot in favour of appellant, Corporation neither issued any advertisement nor followed any procedure consistent with doctrine of equality so as to enable members of public to participate in process of alienation of public property–Impugned Resolution and sanction accorded by State Government are illegal–Appeals dismissed. (Paras 16, 20, 21 and 22)

       (1968) A.C. 997; (1971) 2 QB 175; (2011) 5 SCC 29; AIR 1967 SC 1427; (1979) 3 SCC 489; (1975) 1 SCC 70; (1980) 4 SCC 1; (1996) 6 SCC 530; (1991) 1 SCC 212; (1995) 5 SCC 482; (1996) 5 SCC 510–Relied upon.

Judgment :-

G.S. Singhvi, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. These appeals are directed against judgment dated 16.10.2009 of the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench whereby the writ petitions filed by respondent nos. 1 and 2 were partly allowed, Resolution dated 28.8.1991 passed by Municipal Corporation of the City of Nagpur (for short, 'the Corporation') for renewal of lease in favour of the appellant in respect of Plot No.5, Circle No.19/27, Division I, Old Sarai Road, Geeta Ground Layout, Nagpur as also sanction accorded by the State Government under Section 70(5) of the City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 (for short, 'the Act') were quashed and a direction was issued to Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nagpur to decide Special Civil Suit No. 1135 of 1993 latest by 31.12.2010.

FACTS:

3. On an application made by Gopaldas Mohta (father of respondent No. 1 -Ghanshyam Mohta and father-in-law of respondent No. 2 - Smt. Kamla Devi), Municipal Committee of Nagpur (for short, 'the Committee') passed resolution dated 17.3.1944 for grant of lease to him in respect of the plot described herein above for a period of 30 years. In furtherance of that resolution, lease deed dated 28.10.1944 was executed in favour of Gopaldas Mohta. The tenure of lease commenced from 17.3.1944. For the sake of convenient reference, Clauses 6 and 8 of the lease deed are extracted below:

"6. The lessee shall upon every assignment of the said land or any part thereof within a calendar month thereafter deliver to the lessor or to such person as he may appoint in this behalf a notice of such assignment putting forth the names and description of the parties thereto and the particulars and effect thereof.

8. The Municipal Committee i.e. the lessor will have the option to retake structure at end of the term of 30 years hereby granted by paying the then market value of the structure or to renew the lease on the revised ground rent, fair and equitable, for a further term of 30 years or more.

Provided also that every such renewed lease of the land shall contain such of the covenants provisions and conditions in these presents contained as shall be applicable and shall always contain a covenant for further renewal of the lease."

3.1 After about 3 years, Gopaldas Mohta leased out the plot to the appellant for a period of 27 years (from 28.3.1947 to 16.3.1974). The relevant portions of deed dated 10.9.1947 executed between Gopaldas Mohta and the appellant read as under:

"THIS DEED OF LEASE made on the 10th day of September, 1947, between DIWAN BAHADUR Seth Gopaldas Mohta, resident of Akola (hereinafter called the Lessor) of the ONE PART, and Messrs Saroj Screens Ltd., Amraoti, a joint stock company with limited liability, represented by Mr. Anandrao son of Yadararo, Managing Director, resident of Amraoti, Taluq and District Amraoti, (hereinafter called the Lessees) of the SECOND PART.

WITNESSETH AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Lessor holds and is in possession of a plot of land, situated in the locality popularly known as "The Geeta Ground", in Sitabuldi of Nagpur city in the Central Provinces and more particularly described in the scheduled statement herewith below, which he holds under a lease dated 17th March, 1944, granted by the Municipal Committee Nagpur, and on this plot, the Lessor has constructed a plinth for construction of a Cinema Theatre, as per plans, sanctioned and approved by the said Municipal Committee. Over this plot, certain building materials, such as sand, stones, metal and other iron and wooden material etc., belonging to the Lessor, have been collected and are lying. The Lessor hereby lessee the said plot including the plinth and above mentioned materials which have already been delivered into the possession of the Lessees by the Lessor), to the Lessees, for a period commencing from 28.3.1947 till 16th March, 1974, which is the entire unexpired period of the Lease which the Lessor holds under the Municipal Committee, Nagpur.

The main lease in favour of the lessor, con



































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top