G.S.SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
STATE OF HARYANA – Appellant
Versus
VIJAY SINGH – Respondent
JUDGMENT
G. S. Singhvi, J.-Leave granted.
2. On being selected by the District Level Committee which had considered the candidature of those sponsored by the Employment Exchanges, respondent Nos.1 to 13 were appointed as Masters in the subjects of Science, Maths and Social Studies, respondent No.14 was appointed as Physical Training Instructor and respondent No.15 was appointed as Hindi Teacher purely on ad hoc basis between 1994 and 1996 by the District Education Officers. The relevant portions of one such order issued on 16.10.1995 are reproduced below:
“OFFICE OF THE DISTT. EDUCATION OFFICER, PANIPAT
Order No.E-1/95/3515-65
Dated Panipat 16.10.1995
On the recommendation of the Distt. Level Committee, the following candidates are hereby appointed purely on ad hoc basis as Master/Mistresses in the subject noted against them in the Haryana Education Service Non Gazetted Class II (School cadre) Men/Women branch (as the case may be) w.e.f. the they join their duty in the institution indicated against their names in the grade of Rs.1400-2600 plus usual allowances sanctioned by the Haryana Government from time to time on the following terms and conditions:-
SI.No Name and address of th
Direct Recruit Class II Engineering Officers Association v. State of Maharashtra
Dr.Chandra Prakash v. State of U.P.
State of West Bengal v. Aghore Nath
Rudra Kumar Sain v. Union of India
Major Yogendra Narain Yadav v. Bindeshwar Prasad
I.K. Sukhija v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.