SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 574

Supreme Court of India
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMAR
Rajan Purohit & Others
Versus
Rajasthan University of Health Science & Others
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8142 OF 2011 WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.8143 OF 2011, CIVIL APPEAL NO.8144 OF 2011, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6210 OF 2012 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.24967 of 2011) AND CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6211 OF 2012 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.25353 of 2011)
Decided On : 30-08-2012

IMPORTANT POINTS
Eligibility and selection - distinction.
Directions for regulating admissions to medical colleges issued.

Headnote:(a) Medical education - Admission to MBBS course - Private unaided professional institutions - Absence of consensual arrangement - Such institutions not obliged to admit students from common entrance test. (Para 17)

        (2005) 6 SCC 537; (2002) 8 SCC 481 - Relied upon

        (b) Medical Education - Admission to MBBS course - PC-PMT calling applications only for BDS course and not MBBS course - Students desirous to take admission in MBBS course not applying - Concerned College not included in PC-PMT - College admitting 16 students from PC-PMT to MBBS course - Procedure not fair and transparent. (Para 21)

        (2005) 6 SCC 537; (2002) 8 SCC 481 - Relied upon

        (c) Medical Education - Admission to MBBS course - Selection on the basis of merit - Merit of students passing from different Boards and Universities - Cannot be evaluated only on basis of marks - Proper method is a competitive entrance test. (Para 22)

        (d) Medical education - Admissions to MBBS course - Irregular and illegal admissions - Eligibility criteria and selection process are different things - Admitting ineligible students and admitting students without following proper selection procedure - Instantly, admitted students not at fault for the college not adopting proper selection procedure - Their admission not liable to be disturbed. (Para 27)

        (2011) 3 SCC 617; (2012) 3 SCC 430 - Relied upon

        (1986) 2 SCC 667; (2003) 7 SCC 719; (2011) 4 SCC 606 - Distinguished

        (1999) 7 SCC 120; (2003) 7 SCC 83; (2003) 8 SCC 69 - Referred to

        (e) Medical Education - Admission to MBBS course - Students admitted in violation of MCI Regulations - Not at fault but beneficiary of irregular admission - Should pay some amount for development of infrastructure in medical colleges. (Para 29)

        2012 (5) SCALE 328 : JT 2012 (5) SC 102 - Relied upon

        (f) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 11 - Res judicata - Order of Single Judge of High Court attaining finality - Issue now raised not before the Single Judge - Principle of res judicata not attracted. (Para 9)

        (g) Medical Education - Admission to MBBS course - In case of more than one examining body in the state, marks obtained at 10+2 examination cannot be basis for evaluating merit - Admissions without competitive examination - Violative of MCI Regulation. (Para 10)

        (2005) 2 SCC 65 - Impliedly distinguished

        1986 Supp. SCC 740; (1987) 4 SCC 537; (2005) 13 SCC 704; (2010) 10 SCC 233 - Referred

        Medical Education - Admission to MBBS course - Directions issued. (Para 13)

        (2003) 3 SCC 366 - Relied upon

       Facts of the case:

        This case relates to admission in medical colleges.

       Finding of the Court:

        Admissions by the College were contrary to the principles of merit and in violation of MCI Regulations.

       Result : Appeals partly allowed.

       

Judgment :-

A.K. PATNAIK, J.

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8142 OF 2011, CIVIL APPEAL NO.8143 OF 2011 AND CIVIL APPEAL NO.8144 OF 2011:

These are appeals by way of special leave under Article 136 of the Constitution of India against the common order and judgment dated 03.09.2009 of the Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench, in Special Appeal Nos.241 of 2009 and 386 of 2009.

FACTS

2. The facts very briefly are that the Secretary, Medical Education, Government of Rajasthan, held a meeting on 04.12.2007 for the purpose of conducting a common entrance test for admission to the Medical and Dental Colleges in the State of Rajasthan for the academic year 2008-2009. Besides the Secretary, Medical Education, Government of Rajasthan, the Registrar, Rajasthan Medical University of Health Sciences, Jaipur, Professor Anatomy of Medical College, Jaipur, Special Officer, Technical Education Department, Government of Rajasthan, representative from the Federation of Private Medical and Dental Colleges of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Managing Director, Geetanjali Medical College, Udaipur, Managing Director, National Institute of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, were also present in the meeting. Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital (for short ‘the College’) was yet to receive its permission from the Government of India and affiliation from the Rajasthan University of Medical Sciences and on 12.12.2007, the Chairman and Managing Trustee of the Geetanjali Foundation Shri Jagdish Prasad Agarwal gave a written undertaking that the College will admit the students to the MBBS course only after getting permission from the Government of India and after getting affiliation from the Rajasthan University of Medical Sciences. Another meeting for the aforesaid purpose was held under the Chairmanship of the Secretary, Medical Education on 15.12.2007 and at this meeting it was decided that students will be made available for 85% of the seats in the medical colleges in the State of Rajasthan through the Rajasthan Pre-Medical Test 2008 (for short the ‘RPMT-2008), and the remaining 15% seats of the colleges will constitute NRI quota which will be filled by the colleges. The representative of the College did not participate in the meeting on the ground that inspection of the College by the Medical Council of India (for short ‘MCI’) was going on. The Director of the College in his letter dated 18.12.2007 to the Secretary, Medical Education, Government of Rajasthan, while expressing his inability to attend the meeting on 15.12.2007, explained that the College cannot participate in the admission procedure and cannot give consent for taking the students from the RPMT-2008 till the College received the clearances from the MCI. Thereafter, the inspection report in respect of the College was considered by the Executive Committee of the MCI on 12.05.2008 and the MCI decided to recommend to the Government of India to issue the permission letter for establishment of the College with an annual intake of 150 students for the academic year 2008-2009. The Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, however, took a decision not to grant permission for establishment of the College for the academic year 2008-2009 and communicated this decision in its letter dated 04.08.2008 to the Chairman and Managing Trustee of the Geetanjali Foundation.

3. Aggrieved, the College filed Writ Petition (C) No.357 of 2008 before this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India and on 03.09.2008 this Court disposed of the writ petition after recording the statement of the learned Additional Solicitor General that the revised orders will be passed by the Government of India within a week in respect of the College. In the order dated 03.09.2008 disposing of the writ petition of the College, this Court further observed that the College may complete the admissions by 30.09.2008 in accordance with the rules and procedure laid down for the purpose of admissions. The Government of India, Ministry













































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top