SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 800

G.S.SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
JASARVINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PRESIDENT, LAND ACQUISITION TRIBUNAL – Respondent


JUDGMENT

G. S. Singhvi, J.-Feeling dissatisfied with the market rate fixed by the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in respect of their land acquired by Ludhiana Improvement Trust (for short, ‘the Trust’), the appellants have filed these appeals.

2. The appellants’ land was part of big chunk of land acquired by the Trust for implementing “100 Acres Development Scheme”. Notification under Section 36 of the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 (for short, ‘the 1922 Act’) was issued on 11.8.1972 and objections were invited against the scheme. The State Government accorded sanction vide Notification dated 18.9.1973 issued under Section 42 of the Act. The Land Acquisition Collector divided the acquired land into two Blocks, i.e. `Block A’ and `Block B’ and fixed market value of land comprised in `Block A’ at the rate of Rs.113 per biswansi (Rs.15 per sq. yard). For the land comprised in Block `B’, he fixed market value at the rate of Rs.75 per biswansi (Rs.10 per sq. yard).

3. The Land Acquisition Tribunal, Ludhiana (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) to which the Collector made reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, ‘the Act’) relied upon sale






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top