D.K.JAIN, MADAN B.LOKUR
UNIWORTH TEXTILES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, RAIPUR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
D.K. Jain, J.
This appeal under Section 130-E of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short “the Act”) arises from the final Order No. 142/03-B dated 18.02.2003, passed by the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short “the Tribunal”). By the impugned order, the Tribunal has upheld the levy of customs duty on the import of furnace oil as also the penalty under Section 112 of the Act, rejecting the plea of the appellant that demand of the duty along with the penalty was barred by limitation.
2. The appellant, an Export Oriented Unit (for short “EOU”), is engaged in the manufacture of all wool and poly-wool worsted grey fabrics. It was granted the status of EOU by the Government of India, Ministry of Industry, Department of Industrial Development by way of a Letter of Permission (for short “the LOP”) dated 31.08.1992 as amended by letter dated 4.5.1993. The appellant applied for a license for private bonded warehouse, which was granted to it under C. No. V (Ch.51) 13- 01/92/100%EOU dated 30.09.1992 by the Assistant Collector, Central Excise Division- Raipur for storing inputs, raw materials, etc. either imported duty-free by availing concessions availabl
Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company v. Collector of Central Excise, Bombay
Sarabhai M. Chemicals v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara
Anand Nishikawa Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut
Easland Combines, Coimbatore v. The Collector of Central Excise, Coimbatore
Associated Cement Companies Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs
Aban Loyd Chiles Offshore Limited v. Commissioner of Customs, Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.