SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 460

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Surinder Singh Nijjar & H.L. Gokhale, JJ.
S. Sivaguru - Appellant
VERSUS
State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4483-4485 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NOS.24492-24494 OF 2010]
R. Arulraj - Appellant
VERSUS
K. Jagannathan & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4486 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.25526 OF 2010]
S. Sivaguru - Appellant
VERSUS
C. Selvaraj & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4487 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.25388 OF 2010]
WITH
K. Krishnamurthy - Appellant
VERSUS
Narasimhalu & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4488 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.25417 OF 2010]
WITH
K.V. Srinivasan - Appellant
VERSUS
S. Syed Ibrahim & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4489 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.26159 OF 2010]
WITH
B. Kumar - Appellant
VERSUS
Venkatramanan & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4490 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.25442 OF 2010]
Govt. of Tamil Nadu & Anr. - Appellants
VERSUS
Narasimhalu & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4491 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.566 OF 2011]
WITH
State of Tamil Nadu & Anr. - Appellants
VERSUS
M. Padmanaban & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4492 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.4572 OF 2011]
WITH
State of Tamil Nadu & Anr. - Appellants
VERSUS
S. Sivaguru - Respondent
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4493 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.2179 OF 2011]
WITH
State of Tamil Nadu & Anr. - Appellants
VERSUS
C. Selvaraj & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4494 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.2188 OF 2011]
WITH
Secretary to Govt. Health & Family Welfare & Anr. - Appellants
VERSUS
Venkatramanan & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4495 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.2183 OF 2011]
WITH
State of Tamil Nadu & Anr. - Appellants
VERSUS
O.M. Duraisamy & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4496 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.2191 OF 2011]
WITH
State of Tamil Nadu & Anr. - Appellants
VERSUS
S. Sivaguru - Respondent
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4497 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.2196 OF 2011]
WITH
State of Tamil Nadu & Anr. - Appellants
VERSUS
K.Jagannathan & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4498 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.2194 OF 2011]
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4499 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.3485 OF 2011]
State of Tamil Nadu & Anr. - Appellants
VERSUS
S.Syed Ibrahim - Respondent
WITH
J. Murthy - Appellant
VERSUS
Government of Tamil Nadu & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4500 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.15221 OF 2011]
WITH
K. Selvan & Ors. - Appellants
VERSUS
State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4501-4502 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NOS.4710-4711 OF 2012]
WITH
T. Rajaraman - Appellant
VERSUS
Venkatramanan & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4503-4504 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NOS.10939-10940 OF 2012]
WITH
K.Jagannathan & Ors. - Appellants
VERSUS
Mrs. Girija Vaidyanathan & Anr. - Respondents
CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 133 OF 2012
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4498 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.2194 OF 2011]
WITH
M. Padmanaban & Anr. - Appellants
VERSUS
Mrs. Girija Vaidyanathan & Anr. - Respondents
CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 145 OF 2012
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO.4492 OF 2013
[Arising out of SLP (C) NO.4572 OF 2011]
Decided On : May 07, 2013.

Headnote:Service Law–Pay Scale–Consideration–Issue concerning posts has to be considered from a broader perspective and it does not depend merely on salary of employees–Relevant factors could be nature and duties of a post, responsibilities and powers exercised by officer holding a post; extent of territorial or other charge held or responsibilities discharged; (minimum qualifications prescribed for recruitment to post and salary of post–Since post of Health Inspector Grade IB was for all practical purposes equal to Health Inspector Grade IA, there was no legal justification to continue disparity in pay scales of Health Inspector Grade IA and Health Inspector Grade IB–High Court rightly gave benefit of equation of post of Health Inspector Grade-IB with that of Health Inspector Grade IA from date of their integration, in 1997. (Para 44)

       Service Law–Serivce benefits–Merger of posts–Previous service of transferred officials who are absorbed in an equivalent cadre in transferred post is permitted to be counted for the purpose of determination of seniority. (Paras 46 and 47)

       (1968) 1 SCR 111–Distinguished.

       (2003) 11 SCC 614; (2002) 1 SCC 1; 1994 Sup (3) SCC 451; (1993) Supp. 3 SCC 575; (2000) 7 SCC 561; (2006) 6 SCC 430; (2006) 4 SCC 1; (1998) 6 SCC 165; (2009) 12 SCC 231; (2007) 15 SCC 406; 1995 Supp. (1) SCC 188; (1997) 1 SCC 35; (1996) 2 SCC 459; (2009) 15 SCC 705; (2006) 8 SCC 42; (1997) 10 SCC 616; (2009) 1 SCC 65; (2009) 1 SCC 546; (2009) 15 SCC 321; 1994 Supp. (3) SCC 408; (2008) 1 SCC 722; (1994) 1 SCC 437; (1990) 2 SCC 647; (2008) 4 SCC 171; (1980) 4 SCC 562; (1974) 4 SCC 335; (1973) 3 SCC 559; (1987) 4 SCC 566; (1982) 1 SCC 379; (1982) 2 SCC 116; (2010) 9 SCC 655; (1968) 2 SCR 186–Referred.

       (2000) 1 SCC 644; (2010) 3 SCC 314; (1968) 1 SCR 185; (2007) 10 SCC 684–Relied.

JUDGMENT

SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J.

1. Leave granted in all the Special Leave Petitions.

2. These appeals are directed against the common judgment and final order dated 23rd July, 2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Writ Petition Nos. 23893 of 2006, 34401 of 2007, 8339, 12654, 14592, 17578, 25844 and 27982 of 2008 and Writ Appeal No.312 of 2008 and connected misc. petitions. By this order, the High Court dismissed the Writ Petition Nos. 23893 of 2006 and 34401 of 2007 and allowed the Writ Petition No.17578 of 2008 filed by respondents 3 to 5 and also Writ Appeal No.312 of 2008.

3. Since the facts involved in the controversy in all the appeals are common, we shall make a reference to the facts as narrated by the High Court. This shall be supplemented by any additions made by the appellants in this Court.

4. The facts noticed by the High Court are that initially the Health Department consisted of Multipurpose Health Workers and Unipurpose Health Workers who were engaged in various schemes for eradication of different diseases which were widespread throughout India. By an order dated 29th September, 1982, Unipurpose Workers were integrated as Multipurpose Health Workers. On 4th November, 1988, there was a subsequent integration of employees engaged in the family welfare. Soon thereafter, statutory rules were notified under the proviso to Article 309 by the G.O.Ms. No.1507 dated 16th August, 1989 which were made applicable to the Multipurpose Health Workers Scheme. Under the rules, different Class I and Class II posts were notified and their essential qualifications were prescribed. The essential qualification for appointment to the post of Multipurpose Health Assistant was SSLC and long term Multipurpose Health Worker’s Training Course Certificate or possession of Sanitary Inspector’s Course Certificate and short term training course certificate from multipurpose health workers training. It was further provided that the candidates will have to acquire the long time training course within five years from the date of appointment. The essential qualifications were also prescribed for all other posts. By an amendment dated 19th November, 1990 (G.O.No.1984), the pay scales of Multipurpose Health Assistant were re-fixed. On 13th August, 1991, the Health and Family Welfare Department by G.O. No.1123 prescribed the qualifications for promotions of Multipurpose Health Supervisors as Block Health Supervisors. Vide G.O.Ms. No.4 dated 4th January, 1993 some of the categories were added in the feeder posts of Multipurpose Health Supervisor and Multipurpose Health Workers. These rules were, however, applicable only to those who joined the service under the Tamil Nadu Public Health Services.

5. Again the Health and Family Welfare Department, through G.O. No. 593 dated 11th September, 1995, categorized Multipurpose Health Supervisors and Multipurpose Health Assistants as Health Inspectors Grade I and Grade II. The G.O. further provided that all Multipurpose Health Assistants were to be promoted as Multipurpose Health Supervisors provided they had served on the post for 20 years and had crossed the age of 50 years. This relaxation was given as a one time measure by upgradation of the post. It is pertinent to mention here that the Multipurpose Health Assistants promoted under this G.O. included the Unipurpose Health Workers who had been absorbed pursuant to the integration in 1982. The aforesaid G.O. No.593 was challenged by certain aggrieved persons in Writ Petition Nos. 17550 of 2006 and 25608 of 2006. Prior to this, the rules were amended on 20th December, 1995 w.e.f. 6th September, 1989 by G.O. No.782. It was, however, made clear that the amendment shall not adversely affect those who were holding the post prior to 16th August, 1989.

6. The inter se dispute between the parties in the present appeals originated when the fact of successful eradication of leprosy by the National Leprosy Eradication Programme (NLEP) led to the int































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top