Supreme Court of India
B.S. CHAUHAN & DIPAK MISRA, JJ.
Ravirala Laxmaiah
Versus
State of A.P.
Criminal Appeal No. 2038 of 2011
Decided on : 28-05-2013
AIR 2008 SC 2110 - Relied upon
(b) Criminal Trial - Circumstantial evidence - Incriminating circumstances - Accused not offering any explanation to incriminating circumstance or offers untrue explanation in statement u/s 313, Cr.P.C. - Constitutes additional link in chain of circumstances. (Para 15)
AIR 1992 SC 2045; AIR 1995 SC 1598; AIR 1999 SC 3535; (2000) 1 SCC 471; (2002) 1 SCC 731; (2012) 5 SCC 766; AIR 2010 SC 773 - Relied upon
(c) Criminal Trial - Last seen theory - Murder accused last seen with deceased - Not offering any explanation - Shows his involvement in the crime. (Para 18)
(2006) 10 SCC 681; (2012) 1 SCC 10 - Relied upon
(d) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Accused last seen with deceased wife in the same room - Not offering any explanation for death - Evidence ruling out suicide - Accused strong motive for eliminating wife - Absconding after incident - Conviction justified. (Para 19)
Facts of the case:
This is an appeal against conviction and sentence under Sections 302 and 404, IPC.
Finding of the Court:
Impugned concurrent findings do not require interference.
Result : Appeal dismissed.
Judgment :
Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.
1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 13.7.2010, passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Criminal Appeal No. 302 of 2007, concurring with the judgment and order dated 5.2.2007 of the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Mahabubnagar, Andhra Pradesh, in Sessions Case No. 83 of 2006, whereby and whereunder the appellant was found guilty of the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 404 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as `the IPC’), and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.100/-, in default of payment of which, simple imprisonment for a period of three months under Section 302 IPC; and for the offence punishable under Section 404 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years, was imposed on him. However, both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. Facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are that:
A. Balamani (deceased) was the second wife of the appellant. Their marriage was solemnized in 2002, for which her father had given dowry of Rs.20,000/-, gold earrings, a ring and silver anklets etc. Appellant became suspicious of the fidelity of his wife, and began to beat her up at times. The deceased went to live in the house of her parents because of the ill-treatment meted out to her by the appellant. However, upon the advice of the elders in her family, she decided to go back to the appellant. The appellant and the deceased were taken by G. Balaiah (PW.3), the paternal uncle of deceased to Hyderabad, and there he was engaged in coolie work. Here too, the appellant and Balamani (deceased) would often quarrel, and the appellant would beat her. They eventually returned to their village, and 15 days prior to the said incident, the appellant had taken Balamani (deceased) to Srisailam and here they had worked at Eagalapenta, attending to the petty works in and around the colony for some time. D.V. Subbaiah (PW.2), a neighbour, had seen the appellant and the deceased quarrelling, and as a result thereof, had also noticed Balamani (deceased) weeping.
B. On 12.7.2003, Dasu Krishnaiah (PW.1), father of the deceased, received a telephone call from the appellant, wherein he was informed that Balamani was suffering from a severe stomach ache. The next day, the appellant again made a call to the neighbours of Dasu Krishnaiah (PW.1) and asked them to give a message to Dasu Krishnaiah (PW.1), asking him to come to Eagalapenta. However, Dasu Krishnaiah (PW.1) was unable to reach there. The next day, at about 10.30 A.M., the appellant telephonically informed Dasu Krishnaiah (PW.1) that Balamani had committed suicide. Dasu Krishnaiah (PW.1) immediately rushed by jeep, alongwith his family. On the way, they met the appellant at Santa Bazar at Achampet. The appellant then informed them that Balamani had committed suicide by hanging herself in the `G’ Type Labour Quarters, Near the Krishna Guest House, Eagalapenta. Even on being requested by Dasu Krishnaiah (PW.1), the appellant refused to accompany them and instead, escaped from there. The family of Balamani (deceased) had thereafter reached the `G’ type quarters, and here they found that the dead body of Balamani (deceased) was smelling, and that from it, blood was flowing out of the house over its threshold. The dead body of the deceased was lying on the floor, and two granite stones lay near the head of the dead body. There were tears on certain parts of the body of deceased, which clearly indicated that there had been attempts made to forcibly snatch off her gold ornaments.
C. Dasu Krishnaiah (PW.1) filed an FIR regarding the incident on 15.7.2003, alleging that the appellant had killed Balamani on the night of 12.7.2003, by strangulation. Her nose and ears were viciously cut, and all her gold ornaments and anklets had been stolen.
D. The police had recovered the dead body of Balamani, and had got the autopsy performe
Ponnusamy v. State of Tamil Nadu
State of U.P. v. Dr. Ravindra Prakash Mittal
State of Tamil Nadu v. Rajendran
State of Maharashtra v. Suresh
Ganesh Lal v. State of Rajasthan
Neel Kumar @ Anil Kumar v. State of Haryana
Aftab Ahmad Anasari v. State of Uttaranchal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.