IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.S. Chauhan and Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, JJ.
Neel Kumar @ Anil Kumar - Appellants
Vs.
The State of Haryana - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 523 of 2010
Decided On: 07.05.2012
(2012) 1 SCC 10; AIR 2004 SC 3781 – Relied upon
AIR 2000 SC 2988; AIR 2003 SC 215; (2010) 9 SCC 747; (2010) 12 SCC 310; AIR 2004 SC 3781; AIR 2010 SC 773 – Referred
(b) Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302 – Death sentence – Rarest of rare cases – Principles discussed – Appellant raping and murdering his own 4 years old daughter – Not a rarest of rare cases – However, considering the nature of offence, age and relationship of the victim with the Appellant and gravity of injuries caused to her, a lenient punishment cannot be awarded – Death sentence replaced by life imprisonment for 30 years without remission. (Para 26, 27)
AIR 2011 SC 2689; (2011) 12 SCC 56; AIR 2008 SC 3040; AIR 2010 SC 420 – Relied upon
AIR 1980 SC 898; AIR 1983 SC 957; AIR 2002 SC 1661 – Referred
Facts of the case:
Smt. Roopa Devi (PW.3) wife of Neel Kumar @ Anil Kumar - Appellant, had gone to her parental home at village Kesri alongwith her minor son on 26.6.2007 leaving her two children i.e. daughter, 4 years old and son, 2 years old at her matrimonial home with her husband - Appellant. She had to return back on the same day but could not return and stayed at her parental home.
On the same day, she received information by telephone at 4.00 p.m. from her brother-in-law that her husband had committed rape upon her 4 years old daughter Sanjana.
Roopa Devi (PW.3) came back to her matrimonial home on the next day alongwith 5-7 persons including her family members and neighbours and found her daughter Sanjana, victim, in an injured condition.
Roopa Devi (PW.3), complainant, returned to her parental home alongwith accompanying persons leaving her injured daughter Sanjana and son Vishal in the custody of the Appellant at her matrimonial home. Roopa Devi (PW.3) wanted to take her injured daughter for medical help, but the Appellant and his family members restricted her and even tried to snatch her 15 days old son from her.
Roopa Devi (PW.3) received a telephone call again from her brother-in-law informing her that Appellant had killed her daughter Sanjana. She came there alongwith her brother Gulla (PW.4) and lodged the report against the Appellant for committing the rape on her 4 years old daughter Sanjana on 26.6.2007 and against her brother-in-laws and Appellant for committing her murder on 27/28.6.2007 and concealing her dead body.
Sessions Judge acquitted all other co-accused but convicted the Appellant under Sections 302, 376(2)(f) and 201 Indian Penal Code and awarded death sentence under Section 302 IPC, life imprisonment under Section 376(2)(f) IPC and rigorous imprisonment for 3 years for the offence under Section 201 IPC.
Appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed by the High Court.
Finding of the Court:
There is no infirmity in conviction.
Result: Appeal disposed of.
JUDGMENT
B.S. Chauhan, J.
1. This criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 17.7.2009 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. 268-DB of 2009, by which it has affirmed the conviction of the Appellant under Sections 302/376(2)(f) and 201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as `Indian Penal Code') and accepted the death reference made by the Additional Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhari vide judgments and orders dated 2.3.2009/6.3.2009 and confirmed the sentence of death.
2. Facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are that:
A. Smt. Roopa Devi (PW.3) wife of Neel Kumar @ Anil Kumar - Appellant, had gone to her parental home at village Kesri alongwith her minor son on 26.6.2007 leaving her two children i.e. Sanjana, daughter, 4 years old and Vishal, son, 2 years old at her matrimonial home with her husband - Appellant. She had to return back on the same day but could not return and stayed at her parental home. On the same day, she received information by telephone at 4.00 p.m. from her brother-in-law Ramesh Kumar that her husband had committed rape upon her 4 years old daughter Sanjana. Roopa Devi (PW.3) came back to her matrimonial home on the next day i.e. 27.6.2007 alongwith 5-7 persons including her family members and neighbours and found her daughter Sanjana, victim, in an injured condition. The Panchayat was convened to resolve the problems. However, the Panchayat could not resolve the dispute, therefore, Roopa Devi (PW.3), complainant, returned to her parental home alongwith accompanying persons leaving her injured daughter Sanjana and son Vishal in the custody of the Appellant at her matrimonial home. Roopa Devi (PW.3) wanted to take her injured daughter for medical help, but the Appellant and his family members restricted her and even tried to snatch her 15 days old son from her.
B. Roopa Devi (PW.3) received a telephone call again from her brother-in-law Ramesh Kumar on 28.6.2007 informing her that Appellant had killed her daughter Sanjana. She came there alongwith her brother Gulla (PW.4) and lodged the report to P.S. Bilaspur against the Appellant for committing the rape on her 4 years old daughter Sanjana on 26.6.2007 and against her brother-in-laws and Appellant for committing her murder on 27/28.6.2007 and concealing her dead body. Thus, on her complaint, a case under Sections 376(2)(f), 302, 201/34 Indian Penal Code vide FIR No. 91 dated 28.6.2007 at Police Station Bilaspur (Haryana) was registered.
C. Immediately, thereafter, on the same day i.e. 28.6.2007, on the application moved by the Investigation Officer, the Deputy Commissioner, Yamuna Nagar, authorised Shri Narender Singh, SDM, Jagadhari to pass an order of exhumation of the dead body from the graveyard and on such order being passed, the dead body was recovered from the graveyard. It was photographed and an inquest report was prepared. Dead body was sent for post-mortem examination. The requisite plan of place of recovery of dead body was prepared. The Investigating Officer inspected the place of occurrence on 29.6.2007 and prepared the site plan. The Appellant and his brothers were arrested on 30.6.2007. Appellant was medically examined and on his disclosure statement, the Investigating Officer recovered one blood stained bed sheet from his house and further a gunny bag containing one Pajama, blood stained piece of cloth, pant, shirt and one pillow from a rainy culvert near Majaar of Peer on Kapal Mochan Road (Exts. P-23 and P-25).
D. After filing the charge-sheet, the case was committed to the Court of Sessions and on conclusion of the trial, the learned Sessions Judge vide judgment and order dated 2.3.2009 acquitted all other co-accused but convicted the Appellant under Sections 302, 376(2)(f) and 201 Indian Penal Code and vide order dated 6.3.2009 awarded death sentence under Section 302 Indian Penal Code, life imprisonment under Section 376(2)(f) Indian P
Prithipal Singh v. State of Punjab
State of West Bengal v. Mir Mohammad Omar
Sahadevan @ Sagadevan v. State rep. by Inspector of Police, Chennai
Santosh Kumar Singh v. State through CBI
Pradeep Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Aftab Ahmad Anasari v. State of Uttaranchal
State of Maharashtra v. Goraksha Ambaji Adsul
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab
Machchi Singh v. State of Punjab
Devender Pal Singh v. State NCT of Delhi
Haresh Mohandas Rajput v. State of Maharashtra
Swami Shraddananda @ Murali Manohar Mishra v. State of Karnataka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.