SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 801

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, KURIAN JOSEPH
BAL GOPAL MAHESHWARI – Appellant
Versus
SANJEEV KUMAR GUPTA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.

Leave granted.

1. This appeal is preferred by the appellants against the judgment and order dated 17th September, 2007 passed by the learned Single Judge, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 44387 of 2007. By the impugned judgment, the High Court exercised its revisional jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and set aside the orders dated 31st May, 2007 and 9thJanuary, 2006 passed by the District Judge, J.P. Nagar in S.C.C RevisionNo.1 of 2006 and Civil Judge, (S.D.), J.P. Nagar in Suit No. 17 of 1998respectively. Thus, defence of the respondent which was struck off by the Courts below was restored by the High Court.

2. The appellants filed Suit No. 17 of 1998 on 21st September, 1998before Civil Judge (S.D.) for eviction of the respondent-defendant-tenant from the suit premises, the shop located at Mohalla Raju Sarai Kanth Road, Amroha Distt., J.P. Nagar on the ground of arrears of rent and default.

3. Inspite of receipt of notice, the respondent did not choose to file written statement within the specified period. After long delay, the respondent filed his written objection on 3rd



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top