ANIL R.DAVE, DIPAK MISRA
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Ucchab Lal Chhanwal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dipak Misra, J.
Leave granted in both the special leave petitions.
2. Regard being had to the identic issue involved in both the appeals they were heard together and are disposed of by a common judgment. For the sake of convenience the facts from the appeal arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 21202 of 2011 are adumbrated herein.
3. The respondent was appointed in Rajasthan Police Service (Junior Scale) after his selection through Rajasthan Public Service Commission (for short “the Commission”) vide order dated 19.10.1989. As stipulated in Rajasthan Police Service Rules, 1954 (for short “the Rules”) the R.P.S. cadre is divided into four categories and the lowest category is in the junior scale. The persons from the junior Scale are promoted to senior scale and thereafter to super time scale. The Rules provide that the person who has six years experience in junior scale becomes eligible for consideration to senior scale. A seniority list was published on 19.8.1997 wherein the name of the respondent found place at serial number 51 in junior scale. In respect of vacancies in the promotional posts arising against the quota of 1996-97 a Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) was convened
B.V. Sivaiah and others v. K. Addanki Babu and others
Vijay Kumar Kaul and others v. Union of India and others
Indu Shekhar Singh v. State of U.P.
Service Commission v. Mamta Bisht
Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia v. Board of Revenue
Gulabchand Chhotalal Parikh v. State of Gujarat
Babubhai Muljibhai Patel v. Nandlal Khodidas Barot
Sarguja Transport Service v. STAT
Prabodh Verma v. State of U.P. (1984) 4 SCC 251 (Para 13)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.