Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
19th October 1962
S.J. IMAM, K SUBBA RAO, N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR AND J.R. MUDHOLKAR, JJ.
Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia, Appellant
Versus
Additional Member Board of Revenue, Bihar and another, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 586 of 1962.
Advocates appeared
Mr. H. N. Sanyal, Addl. Solicitor General of India (M/s Jagat Narain Prasad Sinha and U. P. Singh, Advocates with him), for Appellant; M/s D. P. Singh, M. K. Ramamurthi, R. K. Garg and S. C. Aggarwala Advocates of M/s Ramamurthi and Co, for Respondents.
Misc. Judicial Case No. 460 of 1962, D/3-7-1962-Pat.
-held, one without whom no effective order can be made is a necessary party. One in whose absence effective order can be made but his presence is necessary for complete decision on questions involved is a proper party.
-held, petition would be incompetent.
-see decision in Udit Narayan Singh v. Board of Revenue, AIR 1963 SC 786 = (1973) 2 SCC 690 = (1973) I SCWR 740.
Based on the provided legal document, the key points are as follows:
Necessary Parties in Writ Proceedings: A party without whom no effective order can be made is considered a necessary party. Conversely, a party whose presence is essential for a complete and final decision on the questions involved is regarded as a proper party. The absence of necessary parties can render a petition incompetent (!) .
Nature and Scope of Certiorari: A writ of certiorari is issued to quash proceedings of judicial or quasi-judicial bodies acting beyond their jurisdiction or in violation of principles of natural justice. The issuing of this writ requires that the tribunal or authority be a party to the proceedings, as it is a judicial or quasi-judicial act (!) (!) .
Parties Affected by the Tribunal’s Order: In certiorari proceedings, parties whose rights are directly affected by the tribunal’s order are necessary parties. The court cannot effectively quash an order affecting a party’s rights without their presence, as this could lead to an order that the affected party can ignore, undermining the efficacy of the judgment (!) .
Parties Who Should Be Joined: All persons interested in maintaining the regularity of the proceedings or affected by the order should be impleaded as parties. This includes the authority or tribunal whose order is challenged and any other interested parties. The failure to join necessary parties can invalidate the proceedings (!) (!) (!) .
Discretion in Joining Proper Parties: While necessary parties must be joined, courts have discretion to include proper parties to facilitate a complete adjudication of all questions involved. Proper parties are those whose presence is not essential but may assist in resolving the controversy fully (!) .
Procedural Rules and Principles: Procedures from both English law and local rules emphasize the importance of naming all persons directly affected or interested in the petition. Service of notice on all parties who are affected or against whom relief is sought is mandatory to ensure natural justice and the effectiveness of the proceedings (!) (!) .
Specific Application to the Case: In this case, parties who had succeeded in proceedings and whose orders were in their favor were considered necessary parties. The petitioner’s failure to implead these parties, especially after striking them out and not seeking to re-implead them, rendered the petition incompetent. The court emphasized that the petitioner’s actions compromised the fairness and validity of the proceedings (!) (!) .
Court’s Discretion and Late Applications: The court noted that late requests to re-implead parties or to remand the case are generally not entertained, especially if the omission was due to the petitioner’s own actions. Proper procedural steps should have been taken earlier to ensure all necessary parties were included (!) .
Conclusion: The appeal was dismissed primarily because the petitioner failed to join necessary parties in the original proceedings and did not seek to correct this omission in a timely manner. This failure impacted the validity of the petition and the subsequent proceedings (!) (!) .
Please note that these points are based on the principles and facts outlined in the document and do not include specific case law citations.
Judgment
SUBBA RAO, J. : This appeal by special leave is directed against the order of the High Court of Judicature at Patna rejecting in limine an application for a writ of certiorari filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution.
2. The facts giving rise to this appeal may be briefly stated. There is a country liquor shop in Dumka Town. Originally one Hari Prasad Sah was the licensee of that shop, but his licence was cancelled by the Excise Authorities. Thereupon a notice was issued inviting applications for the settlement of the shop. One Jadu Manjhi, along with others, applied for the licence. On March 22,1961, for the settlement of the shop lots were drawn by the Deputy Commissioner, Santal Parganas, and the draw was in favour of Jadu Manjhi. But Hari Prasad Sah, that is a previous licensee, filed an appeal against the order of the Deputy Commissioner, before the Commissioner of Santal Parganas and as it was dismissed, he moved the Board of Revenue, Bihar, and obtained a stay of the settlement of the said shop. On July 13, 1961, the Board of Revenue dismissed the petition filed by Hari Prasad Sah. Meanwhile Jadu Manjhi died and when the fact was brought to the notice of the Deputy Commissioner, he decided to hold a fresh lot on June 19, 1961 and the lot was drawn in favour of the appellant. Hari Prasad Sah filed a petition in the revenue court and obtained a stay of the settlement of the shop in favour of the appellant. Meanwhile one Basantilal Bhagat filed an application under Art 226 of the Constitution in the High Court at Patna and obtained an interim stay; but he withdrew his application on September 8, 1961. The petition filed by Hari Prasad Sah was dismissed by the Board of Revenue on July 13, 1961. On Sept. 11, 1961, the appellant furnished security and the shop was settled on him and a licence was issued in his name. After the expiry of the period of the said licence, it was renewed in his favour for 1962. On June 19, 1961, one Phudan Manjhi, son of Jadu Manjhi, filed a petition before the Deputy Commissioner for substituting his name in the place of his father on the basis of the lot drawn in favour of his father. The Deputy Commissioner rejected the application and Phudan Manjhi preferred an appeal against that order to the Commissioner of Excise; and the Commissioner remanded the case to the Deputy Commissioner to consider the fitness of Phudan Manjhi to get the licence and to consider whether the provisions of R. 145 of the Excise Manual, Vol II, would apply to the facts of his case. One Bhagwan Rajak who was not an applicant before the Deputy Commissioner, filed an application before the Commissioner alleging that there should have been a fresh advertisement for the settlement of the shop according to cl. (13) of R. 101 of the Excise Manual Vol III; and on March 13, 1962, the Commissioner allowed his application and directed the Deputy Commissioner to take steps for a fresh settlement of the shop in accordance with rules. Against the said orders the appellant filed petitions before the Board of Revenue and the said Board, by its order dated May 30, 1962, dismissed the petitions and directed that unless the Deputy Commissioner came to a definite conclusion that Phudan Manjhi was unfit to hold the licence, he should be selected as a licensee in accordance with R. 145 of the Excise Manual, Vol. II. The result of the said proceedings is that the appellant s licence was cancelled and the Deputy Commissioner was directed to hold a fresh settlement giving a preferential treatment to Phudan Manjhi. The appellant filed a petition under Art 226 of the Constitution in the High Court at Patna to quash the said orders. Neither Phudan Manjhi nor Bhagwan Rajak in whose favour the Board of Revenue decided the petition, was made a party. It is represented to us that pursuant to the orders of the Board of Revenue the Deputy Commissioner made an enquiry, came to the conclusion that Phudan Manjhi was not fit to be selected for the g
No cases in the provided list have been identified as overruled, reversed, or otherwise treated as bad law. All entries consistently cite the decisions with deference and reliance, and no entries contain language indicating that any case has been superseded or discredited.
The vast majority of cases in the list follow the principles established in the leading decision, Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia v. Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar (AIR 1963 SC 786). This decision is repeatedly cited as authoritative precedent on the distinction between necessary and proper parties in writ proceedings, particularly under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Supporting entries include:
SARAD NETHIAR AMMA VS KUNCHAPPAN - 1974 0 Supreme(Ker) 48: "Reference may now be made to a decision of the Supreme Court in Udit Narain Singh v. ... Board of Revenue AIR. 1963 SC. 786 on which reliance has been placed by counsel for the respondent."
Chitui Naga VS Onhen Kuki - 1983 0 Supreme(Gau) 119: "As was ruled in Udit Narain Singh v. Board of Revenue."
Dilip Kumar Dutta VS State of Tripura - 1986 0 Supreme(Gau) 35: "Udit Narain Singh, A.I.R. 1963 SC 786 is a leading case on this subject."
DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER VS PUSHPAN - 1983 0 Supreme(Ker) 205: "The Supreme Court in Udit Narain Singh v. ... Board of Revenue, AIR 1963 SC. 786, at 789 observed thus..."
Achankunju VS State of Kerala - 1995 0 Supreme(Ker) 386: "To the same effect is the decision in Udit Narain Singh v. ... Board of Revenue AIR 1963 SC 786 the Supreme Court held that the law as to who are necessary or proper..."
Temple of Thakurji Village Kansar VS State of Rajasthan - 1997 0 Supreme(Raj) 730: "Vide (nearly) Constitution Bench judgment of the Supreme Court in Udit Narain Singh Malpahariya vs. ... Member, Board of Revenue (11)."
Miss Anupamma Swarankar VS State of Rajasthan - 1998 0 Supreme(Raj) 407: "Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar (AIR 1963 SC 786), has held as under:-"
Vaishali W/o Dilip Thakur VS State of Maharashtra - 2021 0 Supreme(Bom) 424: "The Honourable Apex Court in the case of Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia vs. ... Additional Member Board of Revenue, Bihar and Another, AIR 1963 SC 786 ruled that a necessary party is..."
Ram Pujan VS State Of West Bengal - 2022 0 Supreme(Cal) 1603: "A four-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia vs. ... Additional Member Board of Revenue, Bihar; AIR 1963 SC 786 explained the concept of a necessary and proper..."
FEROSH M. BASHEER VS UNIVERSITY OF KERALA - 2022 0 Supreme(Ker) 790: "A Constitution Bench of the Apex Court in Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia vs. ... Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, AIR 1963 SC 786, in the context of examining the question whether..."
Many entries simply note that the Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia decision has been relied upon by counsel or courts in the instant matter, without adding independent analysis of its correctness or subsequent treatment.
Supporting entries include:
Radhey Shyam VS Sohan Singh Manohar Singh - 1984 0 Supreme(Raj) 322: "Reliance has been placed by the learned Counsel on the principles enunciated in the case of Udit Narain Singhs case..."
SHEETANSU SRIVASTAVA VS PRINCIPAL, A. A. INSTITUTE - 1989 0 Supreme(All) 80: "Reliance was placed on Udit Narain Singh v. Board of Revenue, AIR 1963 SC 786."
Tractor and Farm Equipment Ltd. VS Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Dept. of Agriculture - 2004 0 Supreme(Gau) 36: "Drawing attention of this Court to the decision in Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia v. ..."
Parimal Debnath and Ors. VS Amod Bashi Debnath - 2005 0 Supreme(Gau) 541: "Strong reliance has been placed on the decision of the Supreme Court in Udit Narain Singh Msalpaharia v."
Sundargarh Shramik Sangh VS The Industrial Finance Corporation of India Limited - 2005 0 Supreme(Ori) 91: "The Apex Court in the case of Udit Narayan Singh Malpaharia -v- Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar and another (supra) has..."
SHRI MASOOD VS MOHD. YUNUS KHAN - 1992 0 Supreme(All) 756: "Sharma, J. quoted the observations of the Supreme Court in Udit Narain Singh v. ... Board of Revenue, AIR 1963 SC 786..."
GOPAL KRUSHNA BADU MOHAPATRA VS GIRISH CHANDRA NAYAK - 1999 0 Supreme(Ori) 407: "Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar : observed as follows :Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia Vs. ... The Supreme Court in Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia v. ..."
PARAMANANDA BAUG VS STATE OF ORISSA - 1999 0 Supreme(Ori) 387: "The Supreme Court in Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia Vs. ... Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, observed as follows..."
ANIL KUMAR AGRAWAL VS MOHANLAL JAIN - 1999 0 Supreme(Ori) 351: "Kodandi Dora and Others, The Supreme Court in Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia Vs. ... Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, observed as follows..."
Anar Bai VS Manbhar Devi - 1999 0 Supreme(Raj) 1304: "Ranjan, learned counsel for the appellants has placed reliance upon the decisions in the matter of Udit Narain Singh Vs. ... Board of Revenue (AIR 1963 SC 786)..."
NIRMALA DHAR SINGH BAGHELA VS RANJIT SINGH AMAR SINGH DHUMAN - Madhya Pradesh (1999): "The Apex Court in Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia Vs. ... Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, has observed that, the law as to who are necessary or proper parties to a proceeding... Reliance in this connection has been placed by the learned counsel on..."
Kanaklata Das VS Naba Kumar Das - 2018 1 Supreme 358: "See-Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia vs. ... Additional Member Board of Revenue, Bihar & Anr., AIR 1963 786) 1995(6) SCC 580)."
Diwakar Singh VS State Of U. P. - 2004 0 Supreme(All) 2562: "Vide Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia Vs. ... Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, AIR 1963 SC 786..."
KISAN UCHATTAR MADHYAMIK VIDYALAYA SAMITI, DEORIA VS IIIRD ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, DEORIA - 1988 0 Supreme(All) 546: "Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, AIR 1963 SC 786, it was held that it is within the discretion of Court..."
A small number of entries suggest that the Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia principles were considered but distinguished or limited in application to the facts of the case before the court.
Supporting entries include:
Kamta Prasad VS Vidyawati - 1994 0 Supreme(MP) 412: "In Udit Narayan Singh v.Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar (AIR 1963 SC 786), it was held that..." (context suggests the principle was cited but the facts differed).
KAMTA PRASAD VS VIDYAWATI - 1994 0 Supreme(MP) 410: "Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, AIR 1963 SC 786, it was held that it is within the discretion..." (similar contextual citation).
: "Board of Revenue, AIR 1963 SC 786 in this connection." (limited contextual reference).
Divisional Controller, Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation VS Nasirkhan Sadhaji Malek - 2013 0 Supreme(Guj) 676: "Board Of Revenue Reported in AIR 1963 SC 786. ... The following observations of the Supreme Court in the case of Udit Narayan Singh [supra] are relevant..." (selective reliance on observations).
The following entries have ambiguous or incomplete references that make definitive categorization difficult:
STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS SALLENDRA NATH BOSE - 1963 0 Supreme(Cal) 184, STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS SAILENDRA NATH BOSE - 1963 0 Supreme(Cal) 185, PROSAD CH. DAS VS COMMRS. FOR THE PORT OF CAL - 1965 0 Supreme(Cal) 248, LEENA NANDI VS WEST BENGAL BOARD - 1969 0 Supreme(Cal) 192, JAIDEV JAIN AND CO. VS THE UNION OF INDIA - 1971 0 Supreme(Cal) 165, BIRENDRA NATH MUKHERJEE VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 1972 0 Supreme(Cal) 221, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, HEADQUARTERS EASTERN COMMAND, Fort WILLIAM, CALCUTTA VS PARESH CHANDRA GUHA - 1974 0 Supreme(Cal) 269, SWAPAN DASGUPTA VS NAVIN CHAND SUCHANTI - 1988 0 Supreme(Cal) 1, TERAI OVERSEAS LIMITED VS ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS - 1996 0 Supreme(Cal) 176, TITAN ENGINEERING CO. LTD. VS PRADIP KUMAR SENGUPTA - 1996 0 Supreme(Cal) 478, TITAN ENGINEERING CO LTD VS PRADIP KUMAR SENGUPTA - 1996 0 Supreme(Cal) 477, GREAT GOPALPUR TEA COMPANY LTD VS COLLECTOR AND DEPUTY COLLECTOR, JALPAIGURI - 1995 0 Supreme(Cal) 322, ALL BENGAL RICKSHAW UNION VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 1999 0 Supreme(Cal) 640, Purnima Mazumdar VS United Bank of India - 2015 0 Supreme(Cal) 369, Bengal India Global Infrastructure Ltd. VS Chaitainya Alloys Pvt. Ltd. - 2015 0 Supreme(Cal) 418, Biswajit Jana VS State of West Bengal - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 781, Ananda Koley VS State of West Bengal - 2015 0 Supreme(Cal) 668, Sohan Lal Manpuria VS Kolkata Municipal Corporation - 2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 1092, Jyotirmoy Batabyal VS Amila Modak - 2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 256, Barun Kumar Dutta VS Municipal Commissioner, Kolkata Municipal Corporation - 2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 257, AD Electrosteel Co. Private Limited VS Greco International Limited - 2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 1201, Chief Personnel Officer, Eastern Railway VS Pranab Kumar Roy Chowdhury - 1977 0 Supreme(Cal) 200, , : These entries contain fragmented references to the Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia case and related proceedings, but the treatment patterns are not explicitly stated in the provided text.
RADHESHYAM SHARMA VS GOVT. OF M. P. - 1971 0 Supreme(MP) 169, M. P. S. R. T. C VS CHAKRAPAN SINGH DHAKARH - 2002 0 Supreme(MP) 220, MOTIRAM MARIDHYANI VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH - 2003 0 Supreme(MP) 391, KAMTA PRASAD VS VIDYAWATI - 1994 0 Supreme(MP) 410, Central Warehousing Corporation VS J. S. Brah - 2001 0 Supreme(MP) 407, Kamta Prasad VS Vidyawati - 1994 0 Supreme(MP) 412, Chakresh Kumar Jain VS State of M. P. - 2011 0 Supreme(MP) 663, NIRMALA DHAR SINGH BAGHELA VS RANJIT SINGH AMAR SINGH DHUMAN - Madhya Pradesh (1999), Vikrant Educational and Social Welfare Society VS State of M. P. - 2021 0 Supreme(MP) 45, PVR (PREVIOUSLY CINEMAX INDIA LTD) GURGAON, HARYANA VS MALIK BROTHERS - 2015 0 Supreme(MP) 1144, Jamuna Prasad VS Bhaiyalal - 1979 0 Supreme(MP) 526, : These entries cite the AIR 1963 SC 786 decision but do not clearly indicate whether the court followed, distinguished, or otherwise treated the precedent in a specific manner.
Radheshyam Sharma v. Govt. of M.P. through C. K. Jaiswal - 1972 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3, Lakshmikutty Amma v. Chandrasekharan Nair - 1982 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10, THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BADAGARA CO-OP RURAL BANK LTD vs REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES - 2013 Supreme(Online)(KER) 28369, P.A. SUBRAMANIAN Vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION - 2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 26232, RAVEENDRA PANICKER vs DISTRICT COLLECTOR - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 29199, RAVEENDRA PANICKER vs DISTRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTORATE - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 29050, Range Officer Kalakot Range District Rajouri and Others v. Bal Krishan and Others - 2002 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 9, State of J. and K. through Chief Secretary vs Range Officer, Rajouri - 2002 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 2, Chairman vs State of M.P. and others - 2021 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1327, M/s Brahaspati Iron and Steel Company Private Limited vs Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited - 2023 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 11517, Manoj Kumar Agrawal vs State Of Chhattisgarh - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 14447, PAWAN VERMA VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 21351, AGENCE FRANCAAISE DE DEVELOPMENT AFD vs ABDUL WAHID CHOUDHURY AND ORS - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 13021, Syed Gouse Basha vs State Of AP - 2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 19211, N.Janaki Ammal vs The Commissioner, O/o. Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Chennai - 600 034. - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 58499, Rajiv Ranjan Verma, Ashish Kumar, Abhishek Kumar, Uma Shankar Gupta, Satyendra Kumar, Binod Kumar Verma, Arbinda Kumar Verma, Sheo Kumar Verma vs Shailesh Chandra @ Panna Lal, Janki Kunwar, Sushila Devi, Chandrawati Devi, Durgawati Devi, Santosh Kumar, Satish Kumar, Viswanath Singh, Sudhir Kumar Singh, Rajeshwari Singh, Rajnandan Prasad, Satish Prasad, Ramjee Prasad, Rajdeo Prasad, Ram Chandra Prasad, Mis Maini, Shekhar Kumar, Vikki Kumar, Bhuari Kumari, Surendra Kumar Gupta - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 1276, [IND_HC_JHHC010134052005]: These are internal reference codes with minimal contextual language, making treatment classification uncertain.
**Source :** STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS SALLENDRA NATH BOSE - Calcutta STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS SAILENDRA NATH BOSE - Calcutta Narayana Pillai VS State of Kerala - Kerala PROSAD CH. DAS VS COMMRS. FOR THE PORT OF CAL - Calcutta Rajinder Singh Chaudary VS State Of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana Bhagwat Parshad VS Inspector General Of Police, Punjab - Punjab and Haryana LEENA NANDI VS WEST BENGAL BOARD - Calcutta JAIDEV JAIN AND CO. VS THE UNION OF INDIA - Calcutta S. Iqbal Singh VS S. Gurdas Singh Badal - Punjab and Haryana RADHESHYAM SHARMA VS GOVT. OF M. P. - Madhya Pradesh Radheshyam Sharma v. Govt. of M.P. through C. K. Jaiswal - Madhya Pradesh BIRENDRA NATH MUKHERJEE VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Calcutta SARAD NETHIAR AMMA VS KUNCHAPPAN - Kerala Swarna Lata Devi v. Krishna Iron Foundry and Metal Works (P) Ltd. (M/s.) - Calcutta ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, HEADQUARTERS EASTERN COMMAND, Fort WILLIAM, CALCUTTA VS PARESH CHANDRA GUHA - Calcutta Ranjeet Mal VS General Manager, Northern Railway - Rajasthan Chief Personnel Officer, Eastern Railway VS Pranab Kumar Roy Chowdhury - Calcutta Jamuna Prasad VS Bhaiyalal - Madhya Pradesh Lakshmikutty Amma v. Chandrasekharan Nair - Kerala Management of Theatre Sanjaya VS State - Karnataka Chitui Naga VS Onhen Kuki - Gauhati DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER VS PUSHPAN - Kerala Bhanwar Lal VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan Radhey Shyam VS Sohan Singh Manohar Singh - Rajasthan Prabodh Verma: Dalchand VS State Of U. P. - Supreme Court Dilip Kumar Dutta VS State of Tripura - Gauhati J. S. VIRK VS R. D. PRADHAN - Delhi Bal Niketan Nursery School VS Kesari Prasad - Supreme Court SWAPAN DASGUPTA VS NAVIN CHAND SUCHANTI - Calcutta Benu Gohain VS North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Ltd. - Gauhati KISAN UCHATTAR MADHYAMIK VIDYALAYA SAMITI, DEORIA VS IIIRD ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, DEORIA - Allahabad SHEETANSU SRIVASTAVA VS PRINCIPAL, A. A. INSTITUTE - Allahabad Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala VS Ashok Kumar Sehgal - Punjab and Haryana Punjab State Electricity Board Patiala VS Ashok Kumar Sehgal - Punjab and Haryana Kassim VS South Indian Bank Ltd. - Kerala Haridhar Upadhaya VS Jitendra Lal Roy and Ors. - Gauhati SATYENDRA SHYAM NAG VS BANKIM CHANDRA PRADHAN - Orissa Gulzar Singh VS Chhinder Pal Kaur Alias Ranjit Kaur - Punjab and Haryana Navjyoti Co-operative Group Housing Society VS Union Of India - Supreme Court SHRI MASOOD VS MOHD. YUNUS KHAN - Allahabad Indian Railway Service Of Mechanical Engineers Association: Union Of India VS Indian Railway Traffic Service Association - Supreme Court Pritam Singh And Ors. VS State Of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana Bendagmeren Longchar and another VS Merazulu and another - Gauhati Kamta Prasad VS Vidyawati - Madhya Pradesh KAMTA PRASAD VS VIDYAWATI - Madhya Pradesh U. P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad VS Cyan Devi - Supreme Court Achankunju VS State of Kerala - Kerala GREAT GOPALPUR TEA COMPANY LTD VS COLLECTOR AND DEPUTY COLLECTOR, JALPAIGURI - Calcutta Ladu Singh VS The Board of Revenue - Rajasthan [SWADESH MISHRA
VS D I O S FIROZABAD
](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02500034347) - Allahabad GARUDA ADABAR VS STATE OF ORISSA - Orissa KHIRODINI SAHOO VS STATE OF ORISSA - Orissa TERAI OVERSEAS LIMITED VS ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS - Calcutta [DINESH MISHRA
VS DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION HIGHER EDUCATION U P ALLAHABAD
](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02500034775) - Allahabad Skaria Joseph VS Eliyamma Joseph - Kerala [SHEELAWATI
VS MANGING DIRECTOR FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA NEW DELHI
](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02500034565) - Allahabad TITAN ENGINEERING CO. LTD. VS PRADIP KUMAR SENGUPTA - Calcutta TITAN ENGINEERING CO LTD VS PRADIP KUMAR SENGUPTA - Calcutta Mewaram VS I. T. I. , Balotra - Rajasthan R. K. SOOD VS UNION OF INDIA - Sikkim Temple of Thakurji Village Kansar VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan Ghantoli Singh VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan GOPIKA NINA PILLAI VS MEDIA ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED - Delhi Miss Anupamma Swarankar VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan Rawat Ram VS Havita Shree - Punjab and Haryana Ganga Ram Moolchandani & 2 Ors. VS High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan - Rajasthan GOPAL KRUSHNA BADU MOHAPATRA VS GIRISH CHANDRA NAYAK - Orissa PARAMANANDA BAUG VS STATE OF ORISSA - Orissa BAL KISHAN AGARWAL VS PULIN GARG - Allahabad ANIL KUMAR AGRAWAL VS MOHANLAL JAIN - Orissa Anar Bai VS Manbhar Devi - Rajasthan INDIAN OLYMPIC ASSOCIATION, NEW DELHI VS DISTRICT JUDGE, VARANASI - Allahabad Rajasthan State Co VS Narayan Das Purohit - Rajasthan Nabin Chandra Kalita VS State of Assam and Ors. - Gauhati NIRMALA DHAR SINGH BAGHELA VS RANJIT SINGH AMAR SINGH DHUMAN - Madhya Pradesh ALL BENGAL RICKSHAW UNION VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Calcutta State of Rajasthan VS Mohammad Hussain - Rajasthan State of Rajasthan VS Judge, Labour Court - Rajasthan State of Rajasthan VS The Judge, Labour Court - Rajasthan Rajasthan Pharmacy Council VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan Central Warehousing Corporation VS J. S. Brah - Madhya Pradesh Range Officer Kalakot Range District Rajouri and Others v. Bal Krishan and Others - Jammu and Kashmir State of J. and K. through Chief Secretary vs Range Officer, Rajouri - Jammu and Kashmir M. P. State Road Transport Corporation VS Chakrapan Singh Dhakarh - Madhya Pradesh M. P. S. R. T. C VS CHAKRAPAN SINGH DHAKARH - Madhya Pradesh U. P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad Ram Chand Tolani VS State of Raj. - Rajasthan MOTIRAM MARIDHYANI VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH - Madhya Pradesh CHIEF OF ARMY STAFF VS DAYA SHANKER TIWARI - Allahabad Tractor Farm Equipment Ltd. VS Secretary, Govt. of Assam - Gauhati State of Rajasthan VS Sukhpal Singh - Rajasthan Tractor and Farm Equipment Ltd. VS Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Dept. of Agriculture - Gauhati Tractor and Farm Equipment Ltd. , Chennai VS Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Dept. of Agriculture, Gauhati and others - Gauhati [Professor G. K. Rai VS Chancellor, University of Allahabad
](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02500040721) - Allahabad SHANTI SHARMA VS SHANTI SHARMA - Himachal Pradesh Balvant N. Viswamitra VS Yadav Sadshiv Mule (D) Through Lrs. - Supreme Court Suren Patowary VS State of Assam - Gauhati Diwakar Singh VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad Niharedu Majumder VS State of Tripura - Gauhati Sundargarh Shramik Sangh VS The Industrial Finance Corporation of India Limited - Orissa Mangal Dev son of Ram Roop and Shashi Dewivedi wife of Mangal Dev VS State Election Commission through its Election Commissioner, The District - Allahabad Parimal Debnath and Ors. VS Amod Bashi Debnath - Gauhati PUSHPA RANI VS GIAN CHAND - Himachal Pradesh NCT OF DELHI THROUGH DEPT OF EXCISE VS S. P. KHANNA - Delhi PARAMJIT SINGH SARNA, DELHI SIKH GURDWARA COMMITTEE VS AVTAR SINGH HIT - Delhi H. R. T. C. VS Puni Chand - Himachal Pradesh DEVCHAND CONSTRUCTIONS VS BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF MORMUGAO - Bombay Avtar Singh Hit VS Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee - Supreme Court SATYA NARAIN KAPOOR VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Allahabad SATYA NARAIN KAPOOR (DEAD) BY LRS VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Allahabad SUSANNE LENATZ VS C J INTERNATIONAL HOTELS LIMITED - Delhi ESPN Stars Sports VS Global Broadcast News Ltd. - Delhi P. Subba Rao VS Andhra Association (Regd. ) - Delhi RAJENDRA SINGH VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Allahabad Bhanwaroo Ram VS The Civil Judge (Jr. Div. ) Merta. - Rajasthan Panjum Bibi @ Ramjan Bibi VS Najma Alim - Orissa DILLIP KUMAR SAHOO VS SURESH SANU - Orissa SRI SARAT CHANDRA ACHARYA VS BANK OF INDIA - Orissa Krushna Chandra Mallick VS Chief General Manager, State Bank of India - Orissa Shimnit Utsch India Pvt. Ltd. VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan Thakardwara Bhagwan Narain Ji, Pandori Mahantan, Tehsil And District Gurdaspur VS Financial Commissioner, Appeals-i, Punjab, Chandigarh - Punjab and Haryana SARASWATI INDUSTRIAL SYNDICATE LTD VS OVERSEAS INFRASTRUCTURE ALLIANCE(I) PVT. LTD - Delhi DILLIP KUMAR SAHOO VS SURESH SAHU - Orissa Waman s/o Nago Choudhari VS Mahadu Nago - Bombay Public Service Commission, Uttaranchal VS Mamta Bisht - Supreme Court PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, UTTARANCHAL VS MAMTA BISHT - Uttarakhand PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, UTTARANCHAL VS MAMTA BISHT - Uttarakhand Competition Commission of India VS Steel Authority of India Ltd. - Supreme Court Jai Balaji Industries Ltd. VS Union of India - Gauhati BHAGYODAYA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. VS NATVARLAL K. PATEL - Gujarat Ramchandra Dagoji Rangari through VS Vishwanath Champat Naik - Bombay Chakresh Kumar Jain VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh Institute Of Human Behaviour & Allied Sciences VS Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Delhi PRINCIPAL, S. V. DOSHI GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL VS LILABEN SOMABHAI GADASA - Gujarat NAND LAL VS BAKSHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION - Delhi MANOHAR VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - Uttarakhand Revaben VS Vinubhai Purshottambhai Patel - Gujarat THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BADAGARA CO-OP RURAL BANK LTD vs REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES - Kerala ANJANI KUMAR SONI VS HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD - Allahabad Divisional Controller, Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation VS Nasirkhan Sadhaji Malek - Gujarat PHULGEN VS VINAY KUMAR TIWARI - Allahabad Racharla Thirupathi VS Gundala Shobha Rani - Current Civil Cases Racharla Thirupathi VS Gundala Shobha Rani - Andhra Pradesh Oil and Natural Gas Corporation VS Prahladbharti Purnabharti Gosai - Gujarat Facebook India Online Services Pvt. Ltd. VS Mufty Aijas Arshad Qasmi - Delhi A. K. Singhania VS Gujarat State Fertilizer - Gujarat State of Rajasthan VS Ucchab Lal Chhanwal - Supreme Court Deputy Executive Engineer VS Rasul Mullubhai - Gujarat LAXMIKANTA KAR VS SURENDRA PAUL - Orissa H. C. Kulwant Singh VS H. C. Daya Ram - Supreme Court H. C. Kulwant Singh VS H. C. Daya Ram - Supreme Court GOVINDBHAI NATHABHAI PATEL VS STATE OF GUJARAT THRO. SECRETARY - Gujarat Nasim Khan VS State of Jharkhand - Current Civil Cases Nasim Khan VS The State of Jharkhand (then Bihar), represented by the Deputy Commissioner, now represent by C. O. - Current Civil Cases Nasim Khan VS State of Jharkhand (then Bihar), represented by the Deputy Commissioner, now represent by C. O. - Current Civil Cases Nasim Khan VS State of Jharkhand (then Bihar), represented by the Deputy Commissioner, now represent by C. O. - Dishonour Of Cheque Nasim Khan VS State of Jharkhand (then Bihar), represented by the Deputy Commissioner, now represent by C. O. , Jamshedpur, Singhbhum East - Jharkhand Banamali Moharana VS State of Orissa - Orissa Geetanjali Panda VS Pranaya Ballari Mohanty - Orissa Census Commissioner VS R. Krishnamurthy - Supreme Court Odisha Public Service Commission VS Priyambada Das - Orissa PVR (PREVIOUSLY CINEMAX INDIA LTD) GURGAON, HARYANA VS MALIK BROTHERS - Madhya Pradesh Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. VS Surya Chakra Power Corporation Ltd. - Andhra Pradesh Sh Jogendrasinhji Vijaysinghji VS State of Gujarat - Supreme Court Subasini Meher VS State of Odisha - Orissa Purnima Mazumdar VS United Bank of India - Calcutta Oriental Bank of Commerce VS Minarva Dash - Orissa Oriental Bank of Commerce VS Minarva Dash - Consumer GUAJRAT PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION THROUGH SECRETARY VS PARMAR NILESH RAJENDRAKUMAR - Gujarat SARAN UPADHYAYA ADVOCATE VS BAR COUNCIL OF U. P. - Allahabad Bengal India Global Infrastructure Ltd. VS Chaitainya Alloys Pvt. Ltd. - Calcutta Ananda Koley VS State of West Bengal - Calcutta Poonam VS State of U. P. - Supreme Court Mukesh Kumar VS Debts Recovery Tribunal - Andhra Pradesh Gh. Mohd. Matoo VS Gh. Rasool Sofi - Jammu and Kashmir Prem Prakash Sinha VS State of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh INDIAN HOTELS COMPANY LTD VS BINU ANAND KHANNA - Delhi PRERNA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. VS HAKIM SINGH YADAV - Allahabad Fayaz Ahmed VS State - Jammu and Kashmir P. C. Laldingliana VS Zoramsanga Sailo - Gauhati Biswajit Jana VS State of West Bengal - Calcutta Ramakrushna Mudra VS Raghunath Mudra - Current Civil Cases Ramakrushna Mudra VS Raghunath Mudra - Orissa Aditi Shalin Mehta VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat HAIDER ALI KAZIM @ ASAD KAZIM VS MOHAMMAD IQBAL MAHMOOD KAZIM - Allahabad Bansidhar Nayak (Dead) VS Priya Ranjan Mohanty - Orissa STATE BANK OF INDIA VS NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTES THR SECRETARY - Delhi Banchhanidhi Patra VS Bhagabat Prasad Panda - Orissa Deepak Singh VS Sandhyarani Giri - Orissa Z. Shimthar VS State of Manipur represented by the Principal Secretary (TA & Hills) - Manipur Pramila Dash VS Basanti Dash - Orissa Pritish Kumar Giri VS Rusuni Mohanta - Orissa Sabitri Satapathy VS Notified Area Council - Orissa Janaki Das VS Sidheswar Das - Orissa Ilarani Ray VS Jayaprakash Rout - Orissa Maheswar Panika VS Urba Panika - Orissa Amit Saxena VS Addl. Registrar Law Co-operative Societies - Allahabad Suretech Hospital & Research Centre Limited VS Maharashtra Air Port Development Company Ltd. - Bombay Akshaya Kumar Mishra VS Ashok Kumar Mishra - Orissa Meera Patra VS Rekha Pradhan - Orissa VIJAY PRAKASH CHAURASIA VS OM PRAKASH CHAURASIA - Allahabad Kuovio Zhashumo VS Khrienuo Angami - Gauhati Executive Board of Methodist Church in India, rep. by its District Superintendent, Rev. Prabhakar Shadrack VS State of Karnataka, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department - Karnataka Chandrakant Raipat son of Sri Pratapsinh K. Raipat VS Santosh Kumar Ganguly son of late Kashishwar Ganguly - Jharkhand Punam Choudhary VS Prabha Devi - Jharkhand Pradeep Dhapra VS Modi Properties Pvt. Ltd. - Jharkhand Sanjay Tiwari VS Ranjan Kumar Tewary - Jharkhand Raghu Mahto VS State Of Jharkhand - Jharkhand Kanaklata Das VS Naba Kumar Das - Supreme Court Ullalthi Ammanavara Daivasthana, Renjilady Noojibalthila Post Puttur Taluk VS A. C. Kurian S/O. Sri. K. V. Chacko - Karnataka Arpana Das VS Derhasat Basumatary - Gauhati Shreya Milind Nimonkar VS Seema Shanbhag - Consumer Krishnadhan Khaware VS Anandi Devi, wife of late Maheshwar Narayan Mishra - Jharkhand Tarak Gongo, Son of Late D. Gongo VS State of Arunachal Pradesh, Represented by the Chief Secretary - Gauhati Tarak Gongo S/o Late D. Gongo VS State of Arunachal Pradesh, Rep. by the Chief Secretary - Gauhati Jageshwar Gope son of Late Bansi Gope VS Jumini Devi wife of Late Sona Gope - Jharkhand Jageshwar Gope vs Jumini Devi - Jharkhand P.A. SUBRAMANIAN Vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION - Kerala Successor to the 292nd Guru Maha Sannidhanam, Sri La Sri Paramahamsa Sri Nithyananda Sri Thirugnanasambanda Desiga Paramachariya Swamigal @ Sri Nithyananda Swami, Thiruvannamalai VS Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department, Chennai - Madras Sunil David Kachhap son of late Peter Kachhap VS Beronika Lalundia D/o late Kalyan Kalundia - Jharkhand Naveen Chandra Tiwari VS State of U. P. - Allahabad Rita D’Souza wife of Hillary D’Souza VS Jay Mangal Kumar son of late Dani Kumar - Jharkhand Against Corruption & Unabated Taxation (ACAUT) VS State of Nagaland - Gauhati ACAUT (Against Corruption & Unabated Taxation) VS State of Nagaland - Gauhati Dip Narayan Singh VS Malti Devi - Jharkhand Thakur Mahto VS Chimni Mahatwain - Jharkhand Swapna Mohanty VS State of Odisha - Supreme Court Dilip Kumar @ Gagga @ Dilip Kumar Prasad VS Mostt. Urmila Devi - Jharkhand Anita Soni, wife of Sri Rajeev Kumar Soni VS Mina Devi, wife of late Chandra Shekhar Paneri - Jharkhand Swapna Printing Works Private Ltd. VS State of Tripura, represented by Secretary to the Government of Tripura in the School Education Department - Tripura Swapna Printing Works Private Ltd. represented by its Director VS State of Tripura, represented by Secretary to the Government of Tripura in the School Education Department - Tripura Binod Kumar Khowala VS Bhagwati Prasad Khowala - Jharkhand Gyanwati Devi, Daughter Of Late Dhiraj Dutt Tiwari VS Shyam Nandan Tiwari - Jharkhand Meera Choudhary VS Dilip Mahto - Jharkhand Sangeet Dalmia, Son Of Sajjan Dalmia VS Raj Kishore Saboo, Son Of Late Ram Niwas Sabu - Jharkhand MOHD. AURANGZEB VS DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, DEORIA - Allahabad Baidhnath Thakur, Son Of Late Parmeshwar Thakur VS State Of Jharkhand, Represented By Collector Cum Deputy Commissioner Of District Of East Singhbhum - Jharkhand Pradeep Kumar Sahu VS Krishna Kumar Gupta - Jharkhand Bazir Mian, Son Of Late Abbas Mian, Resident Of Village Dudhia VS Mofizuddin Ansari And Ors - Jharkhand Biru Rajak VS Sushil Ranjan Hore, son of late Surendra Kumar Hore - Jharkhand Ghaneshyam Mahato VS Nad Prakash Mahato @ Nath Prakash Mahto - Jharkhand Fagu Sao, son of Late Tirath Sao VS Mansukh Lal Kotecha, son of Late Amrit Lal Kotecha - Jharkhand Sumber Singh Tuti @ Sumbar Singh Tuti VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand Indira K Karippara VS Chandran Shetty - Bombay Indira K. Karippara VS Chandran Shetty - Bombay Arunachalapuram Rama Nadar VS S. Pitchandi - Madras Trivikram Singh Kunwar VS State of Uttarakhand - Uttarakhand Gurunathagouda VS State of Karnataka - Crimes Gurunathagouda VS State of Karnataka - Karnataka Union of India, Ministry of Defence, Government of India, through the Defence Estate Officer VS Arjun Yadav Son of Kishun Yadav - Patna Shahnaj Begum VS Taj Mohammad - Allahabad Jeet Kaur VS Bala Ji Builders - Allahabad Uma Devi VS Satya Kumar - Allahabad Vishal Ashok Thorat VS Rajesh Shrirambapu Fate - Supreme Court Vithaldas Jagannath Khatri (D) through Shakuntala Alias Sushma VS State of Maharashtra Revenue and Forest Department - Supreme Court Gunjan Kumari, D/o Sri Anirudha Mandal VS State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna - Patna Motilal VS Balkrushna Baliram Lokhande, Since Deceased Through L. Rs. - Bombay Bhaw Hari Har Lal VS Collector / District Magistrate, Dehradun - Uttarakhand DHANANJAY KUMAR VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - Chhattisgarh Ram Prakash Sharma VS State Of Bihar - Patna Rewa Pande VS Ramesh - Uttarakhand Tripti Rani Mondal, wife of Sri. Bipad Baran Mondal VS State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Social Welfare, Female and Child Development Department - Jharkhand D. Kumar VS Raichand Daga - Madras Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Rep. by its Chairman B. Ramachandran VS Medical Council of India, Rep. by Secretary, Sector VIII, New Delhi - Madras Shobhan Choudhary VS Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission - Himachal Pradesh Pushpa Drolia wife of Rajendra Drolia VS Sohrai Mahton S/o late Ramautar Mahton - Patna R. Vijiyaraj VS D. Gautham - Madras Sulochana Gupta W/o Radha Ballabh Gupta VS RBG Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its Director Rajkumar Gupta - Kerala Probirth D. Marak VS State of Meghalaya - Meghalaya State of Tamil Nadu, Through its Secretary, Department of Health & Family Welfare, Chennai VS P. S. Sairam - Madras State of Tamil Nadu VS P. S. Sairam - Madras Swami Rupendra Prakash Disciple Swami Hansprakash VS Vijay Kumar Malik - Uttarakhand M. P. Jalan VS Indian Oil Corpn Ltd - Gauhati Om Prakash VS Prayagwati Devi Agrawal - Allahabad Vikrant Educational and Social Welfare Society VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh Chairman vs State of M.P. and others - Madhya Pradesh Vaishali W/o Dilip Thakur VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay Sudha Devi VS Principal Secretary Health And Family Welfare Department - Patna Fatehpuria Dharmarth Trust VS Institute Of Advance Studies In Education - Rajasthan Ganesh Chandra Pathak, S/O Lt. Sanatan Pathak VS State Of Assam Rep. By The Principal Secretary - Gauhati Al-Momin College of Education VS Registrar, Acharya Nagarjuna University - Andhra Pradesh Yashnand Engineers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd. VS State of Assam - Gauhati Bharat Saring, S/o Shri Kato Saring VS State Of A. P. - Gauhati Fit Person, Arulmigu Vettaikurumagan Thirukoil, Nilgiri VS Nilambur Kovilakam Common Properties, Rep. by its Executive Officer, T. N. Ashokavarnan - Madras Vinod Singh Sirohi VS State Of U. P. Throu. Prin. Secy. Home Department Lucknow - Allahabad Vinod Singh Sirohi VS State of U. P. - Allahabad Rishabh Mishra VS State of U. P. Thru. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko - Allahabad Gotan Limestone Khanij Udyog Pvt. Ltd. VS State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Mines Department - Rajasthan State of Manipur VS Maiphai Hongchui - Manipur Ram Pujan VS State Of West Bengal - Calcutta FEROSH M. BASHEER VS UNIVERSITY OF KERALA - Kerala Parth Concast Ltd. Through Mr. Balraj Garg VS State of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh Concept Cars Ltd. Thru. authorized signatory Ram Chandra Rajwar VS State of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue - Allahabad Meena Devi VS Babu Ram - Allahabad M/s Brahaspati Iron and Steel Company Private Limited vs Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited - Chhattisgarh Gundlapurapu Eswaramma W/o Daruga VS State of Telangana - Telangana G. Vittal, S/o, Late G. Nago Rao VS Additional Agent to Government and Project Officer - Telangana Awadhraj Singh VS State of Bihar - Patna Vikram Singh VS Virendra Singh - Rajasthan Sohan Lal Manpuria VS Kolkata Municipal Corporation - Calcutta Md Kaushar Ali VS Ramizul Haque Ahmed - Gauhati Mohammad Rafi Rain VS Md. Hanif - Jharkhand Mohammad Rafi Rain VS Md. Hanif - Current Civil Cases A. Srinivas, S/o. Kumara Swamy VS State of Telangana - Telangana Sunil G. , S/o. Govindappa VS State of Karnataka, By its Secretary, Department of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Sciences - Karnataka Baby Devi VS State of Bihar - Patna Jyotirmoy Batabyal VS Amila Modak - Calcutta Barun Kumar Dutta VS Municipal Commissioner, Kolkata Municipal Corporation - Calcutta Richa Raj D/o Subhash Kumar VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand Raghunath Sahu VS State of Odisha - Orissa Archana Kanungo VS State of Orissa - Orissa P.Naveen Kumar vs District Collector, District Collector Office, Karur District - Madras AD Electrosteel Co. Private Limited VS Greco International Limited - Calcutta Samiksha, D/o. Ramakant Chandrakar VS State of Maharashtra, Through the Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue & Forest Department - Bombay Jharkhand Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Board through its Secretary namely Pradeep Robert Lakra, S/o. Late Jonas Lakra VS Anvil Cables Private Limited - Jharkhand Akhtar Khan VS Distt. Judge, Pratapgarh - Allahabad Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India VS Delhi International Airport Ltd. - Supreme Court Navaratna Estates, Visakhapatnam VS Kari Anasuya - Andhra Pradesh Citicorp Finance (India) Limited VS Snehasis Nanda - Supreme Court Rajiv Ranjan Verma, Ashish Kumar, Abhishek Kumar, Uma Shankar Gupta, Satyendra Kumar, Binod Kumar Verma, Arbinda Kumar Verma, Sheo Kumar Verma vs Shailesh Chandra @ Panna Lal, Janki Kunwar, Sushila Devi, Chandrawati Devi, Durgawati Devi, Santosh Kumar, Satish Kumar, Viswanath Singh, Sudhir Kumar Singh, Rajeshwari Singh, Rajnandan Prasad, Satish Prasad, Ramjee Prasad, Rajdeo Prasad, Ram Chandra Prasad, Mis Maini, Shekhar Kumar, Vikki Kumar, Bhuari Kumari, Surendra Kumar Gupta - Patna N.Janaki Ammal vs The Commissioner, O/o. Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Chennai - 600 034. - Madras Arjun vs Ravi Chand Thakur - Himachal Pradesh Ankura Charana Sahoo vs Sarat Chandra Majhi - Orissa Ankura Charana Sahoo vs Sarat Chandra Majhi - Orissa State of Odisha, represented through it’s Commissioner-Cum-Secretary to Government vs Surekha Samal - Orissa Raveendra Panicker S/O.Narayanapanicker vs District Collector Collectorate, Kottayam - Kerala RAVEENDRA PANICKER vs DISTRICT COLLECTOR - Kerala RAVEENDRA PANICKER vs DISTRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTORATE - Kerala Syed Gouse Basha vs State Of AP - Andhra Pradesh Syed Gouse Basha vs State Of AP - Andhra Pradesh Manoj Kumar Agrawal vs State Of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh AGENCE FRANCAAISE DE DEVELOPMENT AFD vs ABDUL WAHID CHOUDHURY AND ORS - Gauhati Agence Francaaise De Development Afd Frence Development Agency vs Abdul Wahid Choudhury, S/o - Harunur Rashid Choudhury - Gauhati PAWAN VERMA VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - Chhattisgarh
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
