SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 239

V.RAMASWAMI, K.RAMASWAMY
Satya Kumari Kamthan – Appellant
Versus
Noor Ahmad – Respondent


Judgment :

The landlady is appellant in this case. She filed a suit for eviction of the respondent in the Court of the Civil Judge, Bareilly on the ground that the respondent tenant had defaulted in payment of the rent.

The suit was dismissed by the Civil Judge on the ground that certain amounts had been deposited up to January 1979. The learned Third Additional District Judge, Bareilly set aside the order of the trial court and remanded the matter for fresh disposal. Again the tenant defaulted in payment of the monthly instalments as required by Order 15 Rule 5 CPC as amended in Uttar Pradesh.

The appellant moved an application for striking off the defence of the tenant on the ground that he had not deposited the admitted rent and that the rent paid was also insufficient. It may be mentioned that at one stage the appellant claimed rent payable as Rs.100 per month. The tenant was contending that the rent payable was Rs.60 per month and that another sum of Rs.12 is payable towards water and house tax making total of Rs.72.

The Civil Judge by his order dated 7-3-1981 held that there was a default in depositing of the rent for the months of August, September, October, November and Dec
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top