SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 372

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Gyan Sudha Misra, Pinaki Chandra Ghose, JJ.
M/S Bharat Coking Coal Ltd and Ors. – Appellants
vs.
Chhota Birsa Uranw – Respondent
CIVIL APPEAL NO.4890/2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 34133 of 2011)
Decided On : 25-04-2014

IMPORTANT POINT
Respondent’s claim being in accordance with the rules should have been acceopted by the appellant.

Headnote:(a) Service Law – Date of birth – Correction – Respondent joining service on March 31, 1973 – Date of birth recorded in Form B as February 15, 1947 – Basis of this date of birth not known – In 1986, respondent passing Mining Sardarship recording his date of birth as February 6, 1950 on basis of a School Leaving Certificate – Appellant circulating employees’ details for verification in 1987 – Discrepancies in respondent’s father’s name, permanent address, date of birth etc. – Corrections made by respondent recorded except the date of birth – Appellant contending request at the fag end of service for correction of date of birth not acceptable – However respondent requesting for correction in 1987 midway his service career, not at the fag end – High Court rightly gave the directions – No infirmity. (Para 8)

       (2000) 8 SCC 696; (1995) Suppl. 2 SCC 598 – Referred

       (b) Service Law – Date of birth – Determination – Respondent not seeking rectification of records at fag end of his service career – School Leaving Certificate found genuine by appellant – Implementation Instruction No. 76 accepting School Leaving Certificate and Mining Sardarship Certificate as basis for determination of date of birth – Respondent seeking rectification on the basis of these documents – High Court taking correct view. (Para 13, 14)

       R. Kirubakaran; (2004) 3 SCC 394; (2005) 6 SCC 49; (2006) 6 SCC 537; (2010) 14 SCC 423; (2011) 9 SCC 425; (2012) 1 SCC 674; (2009) 1 SCC 80 – Relied upon

       (2000) 8 SCC 696; (1995) Suppl. 2 SCC 598 – Referred

       Facts of the case:

       The respondent had two date of birth recorded in his service records: (i) February 15, 1947 as per Form B; and (ii) February 6, 1950 as per Secondary School Leaving Certificate and his Mining Sardar Certificate.

       His request for correcting the date of birth to February 6, 1950 was rejected and he was intimated that he is to superannuate from February 28, 2007.

       The High Court while allowing the writ filed by the respondent directed the appellant company to conduct an enquiry on the basis of the certificates produced by the respondent and to effectively communicate to the respondent the decision taken together with the reasons assigned within three months of the passing of the order.

       The LPA thereagainst was dismissed.

       Finding of the Court:

       No interference is required in the impugned judgment.

       Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The present appeal arises against the order of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in Letters Patent Appeal No.90 of 2010 dated September 20, 2010, which was filed against the order dated December 11, 2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in a writ being W.P. (S) No. 496 of 2007 filed by the respondent in the present matter, wherein the court quashed the order dated August 2, 2006 passed by the Project Officer, Jamunia Open Cast Project (hereinafter referred to as ‘Project Officer’) Area of the Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (being appellant No. 1 in the present matter), which stated that the respondent will superannuate on February 28, 2007.

3. The brief facts leading to the same are as under :

1. The respondent joined appellant No. 1, Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (‘BCCL’), a ‘Government Company’ as under Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956, his date of joining as per the impugned order is stated to be March 31, 1973. At the time of joining, his date of birth was recorded as February 15, 1947, in Form ‘B’, a statutory form stipulated under the Mines Rules, 1955, the basis of recording the same is not clear. The respondent obtained a Secondary School Leaving Certificate issued on October 12, 1979, which indicated that he attended Rajya Samposhit Uchcha Vidyalaya, Baghmara, a Government school in Dhanbad from January, 1964 to August, 1964. In the said certificate, the date of birth of the respondent is recorded as February 6, 1950, which is in conflict with his date of birth as entered by him in the service records being the aforementioned Form ‘B’.

2. Subsequently, in 1983, he was transferred to the Jamunia Open Cast Project and as stated, he once again signed the Form ‘B’ wherein his date of birth was recorded as February 15, 1947 and he allegedly did not raise any objections then.

3. In 1986, the respondent passed the Mining Sardarship and in the certificate acknowledging the same his date of birth was recorded as February 6, 1950, corresponding to the date recorded in the aforementioned School Leaving Certificate. Therefore, there existed two sets of records of the respondent’s details; first being the Form ‘B’ register on one hand in which the date of birth was recorded to be February 15, 1947 and second being the Mining Sardar Certificate and the School Leaving Certificate wherein the date of birth was recorded as February 6, 1950.

4. In 1987, the National Coal Wage Agreement III (hereinafter referred as ‘NCWA III’) being Implementation Instructions were put into operation for stabilizing service records of employees. Pursuant to Implementation Instruction No. 76, appellant No. 1 provided its employees with Nominee Forms as prescribed by the Implementation Instructions which contained relevant extracts from the service records in the Form ‘B’ register, thereby enabling the employees to identify any discrepancy or error in the records and get the same rectified as per the prescribed procedure. In wake of the same the respondent became aware of inconsistencies in the records regarding his date of birth, date of appointment, father’s name and permanent address; therein the respondent made representations to the Project Officer, Jamunia Open Cast Project for rectification of the abovementioned errors and he specifically sought the incorrect date of birth to be corrected as per the date mentioned in the Mining Sardar Certificate and the School Leaving Certificate. It appears that the concerned authorities rectified the discrepancies regarding the name of the father and the permanent address; however the date of birth and date of appointment remained unchanged. Thereafter, as stated by the respondent, he made a subsequent representation to the concerned Project Officer on July 16, 2006 for correction of the date of birth in the Form ‘B’ register in accordance with the Mining Sardar Certificate and the same was rejected by the appellant company vide letter dated July 19, 2006.

5. The Proj































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top