T.S.THAKUR, C.NAGAPPAN
K. Madhava Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of A. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
T.S. THAKUR, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals are directed against an order dated 9th March, 2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad whereby the High Court has set aside the order passed by the State Administrate Tribunal in OA No.6334 of 1997 to the extent the same holds the judgment of this Court in V. Jagannadha Rao and Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. (2001) 10 SCC 401, to be prospective in its application. An order dated 3rd November, 2010 passed by the High Court dismissing a review petition filed by the appellants against the said order has also been assailed. The facts in the backdrop are as under:
3. In V. Jagannadha Rao and Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. (2001) 10 SCC 401, a three-Judge Bench was examining whether Special Rules framed by the Governor of Andhra Pradesh under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution to the extent the same permitted “appointment by transfer” to a higher category on the basis of seniority-cum-efficiency were violative of para 5(2) of the Presidential Order issued under Article 371-D of the Constitution of India, 1950. Answering the question in the affirmative this Court held that
M/s Somaiya Organics (India) Ltd. v. State of U.P.
Kailash Chand Sharma v. State of Rajasthan
Managing Director, ECIL Hyderabad v. B. Karunakar
V. Jagannadha Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh
State of Andhra Pradesh v. V. Sadanandam
Govt. Of A.P. v. B. Satyanarayana Rao (Dead) by Lrs.
State of Andhra Pradesh v. V. Sadanandam
C. Golak Nath v. State of Punjab
India Cement Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu
Orissa Cement Ltd. v. State of Orissa
Union of India v. Mohd. Ramzan Khan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.