T.S.THAKUR, C.NAGAPPAN
Hussein Ghadially @ M. H. G. A Shaikh – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT
T.S. THAKUR, J.
1. Common questions of law arise for consideration in these appeals which were heard together and shall stand disposed of by this common order. The appeals arise out of two separate judgments delivered by the Designated Court at Surat both dated 4th October, 2008 whereby the Designated Court has while acquitting some of the accused persons convicted the rest and sentenced them to imprisonment for different periods ranging between 10 to 20 years. In Criminal (TADA) case No.41 of 1995 disposed of with Criminal (TADA) case No.1 of 2000 arising out of C.R. No.70 of 1993 relevant to Criminal Appeals No.92 of 2009 and 658 of 2009, the Designated Court has convicted the appellants in those appeals while respondents in Criminal Appeal No.305 of 2009 filed by the State of Gujarat against the very same judgment have been acquitted. In Criminal Appeals No.432-33 of 2009 the State has sought enhancement of the sentence awarded to those convicted by the Trial Court.
2. In Criminal (TADA) case No.59 of 1995 and 2 of 2000 arising out of C.R. No.32 of 1993 the Designated Court
Aniruddhsinhji Jadeja v. State of Gujarat
Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh v. State of Vindhya Pradesh
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Singhara Singh
Dhananjaya Reddy v. State of Karnataka
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. v. Essar Power Ltd.
Commissioner of Police v. Gordhandas Bhanji
Manohar Lall (dead) by Lrs. v. Ugrasen (dead) by Lrs.
Rangku Dutta @ Ranjan Kumar Dutta v. State of Assam
Ahmad Umar Saeed Sheikh v. State of U.P.
Ashrafkhan @ Babu Munnekhan Pathan v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.